These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8693166)

  • 1. Citizen perceptions of risks associated with moving radiological waste.
    McBeth MK; Oakes AS
    Risk Anal; 1996 Jun; 16(3):421-7. PubMed ID: 8693166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceived risks of radioactive waste transport through Oregon: results of a statewide survey.
    MacGregor D; Slovic P; Mason RG; Detweiler J; Binney SE; Dodd B
    Risk Anal; 1994 Feb; 14(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 8146403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On-site storage of high level nuclear waste: attitudes and perceptions of local residents.
    Bassett GW; Jenkins-Smith HC; Silva C
    Risk Anal; 1996 Jun; 16(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8693158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reversing nuclear opposition: evolving public acceptance of a permanent nuclear waste disposal facility.
    Jenkins-Smith HC; Silva CL; Nowlin MC; deLozier G
    Risk Anal; 2011 Apr; 31(4):629-44. PubMed ID: 21175714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of local acceptance of a radioactive waste disposal facility.
    Chung JB; Kim HK; Rho SK
    Risk Anal; 2008 Aug; 28(4):1021-32. PubMed ID: 18627537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attitudes and risk perceptions of stakeholders in a nuclear waste siting issue.
    Sjöberg L
    Risk Anal; 2003 Aug; 23(4):739-49. PubMed ID: 12926567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The trouble of transporting radioactive materials.
    Burton A
    Lancet Oncol; 2004 Nov; 5(11):642. PubMed ID: 15536679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Public attitudes and risk perception toward land application of biosolids within the south-eastern United States.
    Robinson KG; Robinson CH; Raup LA; Markum TR
    J Environ Manage; 2012 May; 98():29-36. PubMed ID: 22325641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Public meetings about local waste management problems: comparing participants to nonparticipants.
    McComas KA
    Environ Manage; 2001 Jan; 27(1):135-47. PubMed ID: 11083914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Public-private partnerships in the siting of hazardous waste facilities: the importance of trust.
    Ibitayo OO
    Waste Manag Res; 2002 Jun; 20(3):212-22. PubMed ID: 12152889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk perception in context: the Savannah River Site Stakeholder Study.
    Williams BL; Brown S; Greenberg M; Kahn MA
    Risk Anal; 1999 Dec; 19(6):1019-35. PubMed ID: 10765444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterizing potential exposure to the public from low-level radioactive waste transportation by truck.
    Miller JJ; Shafer DS; Gray KJ; Church BW; Tappen JJ; Campbell SA; Holz BA
    Health Phys; 2007 Dec; 93(6):645-55. PubMed ID: 17993845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Public and occupational risks of the Nevada (USA) Test Site.
    Inhaber H
    Environ Manage; 2001 Oct; 28(4):505-17. PubMed ID: 11494069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Panel discussion: low level radioactive waste: how does society respond?
    Gershey EL; Eisenbud M; Hall E; Maillie D; Houk V; Lutzker L; Curran AS; Dunkleberger J; Kerr T; Charnigo C
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1989; 65(4):537-52. PubMed ID: 2819312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The voluntary siting process, a case study in New Jersey.
    Stencel JR; Lee KY
    Health Phys; 2004 Feb; 86(2 Suppl):S57-63. PubMed ID: 14744073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nuclear waste transportation: case studies of identifying stakeholder risk information needs.
    Drew CH; Grace DA; Silbernagel SM; Hemmings ES; Smith A; Griffith WC; Takaro TK; Faustman EM
    Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Mar; 111(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 12611653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low level radioactive waste: the public health response.
    Curran AS
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1989; 65(4):497-500. PubMed ID: 2819304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Residents' concerns and attitudes toward solid waste management facilities in Palestine: a case study of Hebron district.
    Al-Khatib IA; Ajlouny H; Al-Sari' MI; Kontogianni S
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Mar; 32(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 24522776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. TRU waste absorbent addition project at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory.
    Colson RG; Auman LE
    Health Phys; 2003 Aug; 85(2 Suppl):S56-64. PubMed ID: 12865753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptions of on-site hunters: environmental concerns, future land use, and cleanup options at the Savannah river site.
    Burger J; Sanchez J
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 1999 Jun; 57(4):267-81. PubMed ID: 10406350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.