These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1061 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8693765)
1. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life]. Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR]. Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Benefits and limits of single chamber atrial pacing with adaptive rate]. Pouillot C; Mabo P; Lelong B; Cazeau S; Paillard F; de Place C; Daubert JC Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1990 Nov; 83(12):1833-42. PubMed ID: 2125194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved cardiac function and quality of life following upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation. Höijer CJ; Brandt J; Willenheimer R; Juul-Möller S; Boström PA Eur Heart J; 2002 Mar; 23(6):490-7. PubMed ID: 11863352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term haemodynamic and antiarrhythmic benefits of DDIR versus DDI pacing mode in sick sinus syndrome and chronotropic incompetence. Santini M; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Mangiameli S; Proclemer A; Menozzi C; De Fabrizio G; Leoni G; Lisi F; De Seta F G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 27(9):892-900. PubMed ID: 9378194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy and tolerability of continuous overdrive atrial pacing in atrial fibrillation. Lam CT; Lau CP; Leung SK; Tse HF; Lee KL; Tang MO; Tsang V Europace; 2000 Oct; 2(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 11194594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The incremental benefit of rate-adaptive pacing on exercise performance during cardiac resynchronization therapy. Tse HF; Siu CW; Lee KL; Fan K; Chan HW; Tang MO; Tsang V; Lee SW; Lau CP J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Dec; 46(12):2292-7. PubMed ID: 16360061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Cardiopulmonary stress: control of the function of frequency variable pacemaker systems]. Treese N; Coutinho M; Ophoff N; Rhein S; Pop T; Meyer J Z Kardiol; 1990 Jun; 79(6):396-402. PubMed ID: 2378157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation by cardiopulmonary exercise test of DDDR versus DDD pacing. Capucci A; Boriani G; Specchia S; Marinelli M; Santarelli A; Magnani B Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1908-13. PubMed ID: 1279570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rate augmentation and atrial arrhythmias in DDDR pacing. Spencer WH; Markowitz T; Alagona P Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1847-51. PubMed ID: 1704552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of heart rate on the working capacity of patients with complete heart block and physiological pacemaker. Lukl J; Heinc P Cor Vasa; 1991; 33(6):506-13. PubMed ID: 1842943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Chronotropic competence in patients with the sick sinus syndrome wearing AAI or DDD pacemakers]. Goicolea de Oro A; Márquez L; López Gil M; Kallmeyer C; Chicote R; García-Cosío F Rev Esp Cardiol; 1993 Jun; 46(6):335-9. PubMed ID: 8316699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The VO2 performance index for evaluation of cardiopulmonary capacity in respiratory minute volume controlled VVI-R stimulation]. Epperlein S; Treese N; Stegmaier A; Coutinho M; Meyer J Z Kardiol; 1994 May; 83(5):343-50. PubMed ID: 8053243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Antiarrhythmic benefits of dual chamber stimulation with rate-response in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and chronotropic incompetence: a prospective, multicentre study. Bellocci F; Spampinato A; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Capucci A; Dini P; Boriani G; Botto G; Curnis A; Moracchini PV; Nicotra G; Lisi F; Nigro P Europace; 1999 Oct; 1(4):220-5. PubMed ID: 11220558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life. Lau CP; Tai YT; Leung WH; Wong CK; Lee P; Chung FL Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DDD versus VVIR versus VVI mode in patients with indication to dual-chamber stimulation: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study. Moro E; Caprioglio F; Berton G; Marcon C; Riva U; Corbucci G; Delise P Ital Heart J; 2005 Sep; 6(9):728-33. PubMed ID: 16212074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Chronic frequency-adaptive pacemaker therapy in patients with heart failure]. Haltern G; Kempa L; Ochs JG; Hanrath P; Sigmund M Z Kardiol; 1995 Oct; 84(10):834-43. PubMed ID: 7502571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exercise hemodynamic benefits of rate adaptive ventricular pacing. Ma J; Wang F; Zhang K; Yu P; Wang J; Chen X Chin Med J (Engl); 1996 Jun; 109(6):459-62. PubMed ID: 9206079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of VVI and DDD cardiac stimulation during exercise test evaluated by respiratory gas exchange measurement. Study of patients with normal systolic function and complete atrioventricular block unchanged during exercise test]. Chabernaud JM; Guéret P; Blanc P; Bavoux O; Bensaid J Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1993 Jan; 86(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 8338403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increased base rate of atrial pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation after implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker: insights from the Atrial Overdrive Pacing Study. Kantharia BK; Freedman RA; Hoekenga D; Tomassoni G; Worley S; Sorrentino R; Steinhaus D; Wolkowicz JM; Syed ZA; Europace; 2007 Nov; 9(11):1024-30. PubMed ID: 17913697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]