These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8695002)

  • 1. Effect of Amalgambond on cervical sensitivity.
    Calamia JR; Styner DL; Rattet AH
    Am J Dent; 1995 Dec; 8(6):283-4. PubMed ID: 8695002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of a one-bottle bonding system for desensitizing exposed roots.
    Ferrari M; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Oct; 12(5):243-9. PubMed ID: 10649916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polymeric sealing of dentinal tubules to control sensitivity: preliminary observations.
    Ianzano JA; Gwinnett AJ; Westbay G
    Periodontal Clin Investig; 1993; 15(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 7919861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical effectiveness of two agents on the treatment of tooth cervical hypersensitivity.
    Kakaboura A; Rahiotis C; Thomaidis S; Doukoudakis S
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 16296439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of Prime & Bond 2.1 for treating cervical dentin hypersensitivity.
    Swift EJ; May KN; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 11806472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of the role of glutardialdehyde in a one-bottle adhesive.
    Dondi dall'Orologio G; Lone A; Finger WJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Oct; 15(5):330-4. PubMed ID: 12537345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentin desensitizing effects of Gluma Alternate, Health-Dent Desensitizer and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose.
    Dondi dall'Orologio G; Lorenzi R; Anselmi M; Opisso V
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):103-6. PubMed ID: 10649929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Gluma bonding system: a clinical evaluation of its various components for the treatment of hypersensitive root dentin.
    Davidson DF; Suzuki M
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1997 Jan; 63(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 9009533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity with resin adhesives: 4-week evaluation.
    Prati C; Cervellati F; Sanasi V; Montebugnoli L
    Am J Dent; 2001 Dec; 14(6):378-82. PubMed ID: 11949798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One-year clinical evaluation of an ethanol-based and a solvent-free dentin adhesive.
    Aw TC; Lepe X; Johnson GH; Mancl L
    Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):451-6. PubMed ID: 15724760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of two adhesive composite cements for the suppression of dentinal cold sensitivity.
    Sensat ML; Brackett WW; Meinberg TA; Beatty MW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 12239480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The long-term effectiveness of five current desensitizing products on cervical dentine sensitivity.
    Duran I; Sengun A
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 15089941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo sensitivity of human root dentin to air blast and scratching.
    Camps J; Pashley D
    J Periodontol; 2003 Nov; 74(11):1589-94. PubMed ID: 14682655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 2% sodium fluoride-iontophoresis compared to a commercially available desensitizing agent.
    Singal P; Gupta R; Pandit N
    J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 15857067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of different liner treatments on postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations.
    Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Hucke RD; Smith GE
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Jan; 30(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 10323159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer liner for cervical dentin hypersensitivity treatment.
    Tantbirojn D; Poolthong S; Leevailoj C; Srisawasdi S; Hodges JS; Randall RC
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 16555659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of dentin desensitizers and dentin bonding agents on dentin permeability.
    Jain P; Reinhardt JW; Krell KV
    Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 11763898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effectiveness of Systemp.desensitizer in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity.
    Stewardson DA; Crisp RJ; McHugh S; Lendenmann U; Burke FJ
    Prim Dent Care; 2004 Jul; 11(3):71-6. PubMed ID: 15242562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the efficacy in providing instant relief of dentin hypersensitivity of a new toothpaste containing 8.0% arginine, calcium carbonate, and 1450 ppm fluoride to a benchmark desensitizing toothpaste containing 2% potassium ion and 1450 ppm fluoride, and to a control toothpaste with 1450 ppm fluoride: a three-day clinical study in Mississauga, Canada.
    Ayad F; Ayad N; Delgado E; Zhang YP; DeVizio W; Cummins D; Mateo LR
    J Clin Dent; 2009; 20(4):115-22. PubMed ID: 19831164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct dentin bonding technique sensitivity when using air/suction drying steps.
    Magne P; Mahallati R; Bazos P; So WS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(2):130-8; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 18380845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.