These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8695198)

  • 21. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics: relationships in patients with and without endolymphatic hydrops.
    Fetterman BL
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):946-54. PubMed ID: 11404602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Is otoacoustic emission useful in the differential diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing loss?].
    Sliwińska-Kowalska M; Kotylo P
    Med Pr; 1997; 48(6):613-20. PubMed ID: 9558629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: hit and false-positive rates in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Musiek FE; Baran JA
    Am J Otol; 1997 Jul; 18(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 9233485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hearing aids and cochlear damage: the case against fitting the pure tone audiogram.
    Halpin C; Rauch SD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 May; 140(5):629-32. PubMed ID: 19393401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Otoacoustic emission measurements: clinical case reports. Part III].
    Kowalska S; Sułkowski W
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1997; 51(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 9489385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Examinations of distortion product otoacoustic emission in hereditary progressive non-syndromic hearing loss].
    Ke X; Yu H; Liu Y; Gu Z; Lu Y; Li L
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Apr; 35(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 12768663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relation of distortion product otoacoustic emission with tinnitus.
    Ami M; Abdullah A; Awang MA; Liyab B; Saim L
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Apr; 118(4):712-7. PubMed ID: 18176342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Study of the correspondence between pure tone and distorsion product otoacoustic emissions audiometrics: basis for an objective cochlear audiometrics model].
    Jürgens A; Buisan A; Canela M; Abelló P
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1999 May; 50(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 10431072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The cochlea: modern physiologic insights into sensorineural hearing loss].
    Frijns JH; Schoonhoven R
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Apr; 142(15):830-6. PubMed ID: 9623155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Long-term audiometric follow-up of click-evoked auditory brainstem response in hearing-impaired infants.
    Schoonhoven R; Lamoré PJ; de Laat JA; Grote JJ
    Audiology; 2000; 39(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 10905399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Otoacoustic emission and auditory efferent function testing in patients with sensori-neural hearing loss.
    Liang F; Liu C; Liu B
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1997 Feb; 110(2):139-41. PubMed ID: 9594286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Carriers of the Usher syndrome type IB: is audiometric identification possible?
    Wagenaar M; Snik AF; Kimberling WJ; Cremers CW
    Am J Otol; 1996 Nov; 17(6):853-8. PubMed ID: 8915413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Applications of distortion-product emissions to an otological practice.
    Kimberley BP
    Laryngoscope; 1999 Dec; 109(12):1908-18. PubMed ID: 10591346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Noise in magnetic resonance imaging: no risk for sensorineural function but increased amplitude variability of otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W; Staud I; Frank G; Dammann F; Plontke S; Plinkert PK
    Laryngoscope; 2003 Jul; 113(7):1216-23. PubMed ID: 12838022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cochlear origin of hearing loss in MELAS syndrome.
    Sue CM; Lipsett LJ; Crimmins DS; Tsang CS; Boyages SC; Presgrave CM; Gibson WP; Byrne E; Morris JG
    Ann Neurol; 1998 Mar; 43(3):350-9. PubMed ID: 9506552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Studies of the evaluation of cochlea function with distortion product otoacoustic emission].
    Kashiwamura M
    Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 1998 Nov; 73(6):641-62. PubMed ID: 10036620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Steady-state response audiometry in a group of patients with steeply sloping sensorineural hearing loss.
    Ballay C; Tonini R; Waninger T; Yoon C; Manolidis S
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jul; 115(7):1243-6. PubMed ID: 15995514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test of sensorineural hearing loss: performance regarding sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristics.
    Kim DO; Paparello J; Jung MD; Smurzynski J; Sun X
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1996 Jan; 116(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 8820343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.