These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8695445)

  • 1. Determined to replace a central pay system. Interview by Dina Leifer.
    Dorrell S
    Nurs Stand; 1996 Feb; 10(22):16-7. PubMed ID: 8695445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. All a misunderstanding. Interview by Dina Leifer.
    Jarrold K
    Nurs Stand; 1995 May 3-9; 9(32):14. PubMed ID: 7786729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regional pay: the nursing organisations' viewpoint.
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Jan; 3(18):12-3. PubMed ID: 2494513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gearing up for the next pay review.
    Chudley P
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Aug; (358):1, 11. PubMed ID: 6565990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Members vote for peace and pay review promise.
    Chudley P
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1982 Dec; (276):1, 8. PubMed ID: 6984527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nurses's pay: a solid case.
    Sylvester J
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Oct; 4(5):22. PubMed ID: 2511481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pay: reviewing the situation.
    Hand D
    Nurs Stand; 1991 Nov 27-Dec 3; 6(10):18-9. PubMed ID: 1764394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pay campaign. Working to rules.
    Payne D
    Nurs Times; 1995 Apr 12-18; 91(15):18. PubMed ID: 7731836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pay. In and out of pocket.
    Leifer D; Scott G
    Nurs Stand; 1995 May 31-Jun 6; 9(36):21. PubMed ID: 7612439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. College evidence calls for 'immediate and significant pay increases'.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Dec; (377):suppl 3. PubMed ID: 6569342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Initial views on pay review body.
    Ellis S
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1983 Jan; (277):1. PubMed ID: 6550405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. All at sea on pay?
    Webb J
    Nurs Times; 1987 Jan 14-20; 83(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 3643548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Back to the 80 pound pay target.
    Packham H
    Nurs Mirror; 1979 Jun; 148(23):14-6. PubMed ID: 256096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pay campaign. Striking precedents.
    Snell J
    Nurs Times; 1995 Mar 22-8; 91(12):20-1. PubMed ID: 7716032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pay campaign. Stringing along.
    Cassidy J
    Nurs Times; 1995 Apr 19-25; 91(16):16. PubMed ID: 7731850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Has anyone seen their top-up pay?
    Cassidy J
    Nurs Times; 1996 May 29-Jun 4; 92(22):20-1. PubMed ID: 8716488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nurses' pay: lifting the lower grades.
    Gray J; Naish J
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Sep; 4(1):24. PubMed ID: 2510005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pay and conditions: the state of the nursing nation.
    Hand D
    Nurs Stand; 1992 Oct 21-27; 7(5):18. PubMed ID: 1450020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recruitment and retention: vital evidence in the pay debate.
    Lampada; 1988 Jan; (13):4. PubMed ID: 3357360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pay campaign. Protest without tears?
    Payne D
    Nurs Times; 1995 May 10-16; 91(19):16. PubMed ID: 7770335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.