221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8695965)
1. Hologic QDR 2000 whole-body scans: a comparison of three combinations of scan modes and analysis software.
Spector E; LeBlanc A; Shackelford L
Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(6):440-5. PubMed ID: 8695965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo whole body and appendicular bone mineral density in rats: a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry study.
Karahan S; Kincaid SA; Lauten SD; Wright JC
Comp Med; 2002 Apr; 52(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 12022394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The accuracy and precision of DXA for assessing body composition in team sport athletes.
Bilsborough JC; Greenway K; Opar D; Livingstone S; Cordy J; Coutts AJ
J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(19):1821-8. PubMed ID: 24914773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparisons between Hologic QDR 1000W, QDR 4500A, and Lunar Expert dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanners used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue.
Tothill P; Hannan WJ
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2000 May; 904():63-71. PubMed ID: 10865711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Hologic QDR-1000/W and 4500W DXA Scanners in 13- to 18-Year Olds.
Litaker MS; Barbeau P; Humphries MC; Gutin B
Obes Res; 2003 Dec; 11(12):1545-52. PubMed ID: 14694220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue.
Tothill P; Hannan WJ; Wilkinson S
Br J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 74(878):166-76. PubMed ID: 11718390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of body composition and bone mineral measurements from two DXA instruments in young men.
Modlesky CM; Lewis RD; Yetman KA; Rose B; Rosskopf LB; Snow TK; Sparling PB
Am J Clin Nutr; 1996 Nov; 64(5):669-76. PubMed ID: 8901784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.
Blake GM; Parker JC; Buxton FM; Fogelman I
Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):902-6. PubMed ID: 8220974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Agreement between dual x-ray absorptiometers using pencil beam and fan beam: indicators of bone health and whole-body plus appendicular tissue composition in adult athletes.
Tavares Ó; Duarte JP; Costa DC; Sousa-E-Silva P; Martinho D; Lus LGO; Duarte-Mendes P; Valente-Dos-Santos J; Conde J; Casanova JM; Cyrino ES; Coelho-E-Silva MJ
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2018 Apr; 64(4):330-338. PubMed ID: 30133612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeatability and reproducibility of measurements obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry on pig carcasses.
Kipper M; Marcoux M; Andretta I; Pomar C
J Anim Sci; 2018 May; 96(5):2027-2037. PubMed ID: 29722809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intersite comparison of the Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray bone densitometer.
Blake GM; Tong CM; Fogelman I
Br J Radiol; 1991 May; 64(761):440-6. PubMed ID: 2036569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone mineral and body composition measurements: cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
Ellis KJ; Shypailo RJ
J Bone Miner Res; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1613-8. PubMed ID: 9783550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Hand Positioning on DXA Total and Regional Bone and Body Composition Parameters, Precision Error, and Least Significant Change.
Thurlow S; Oldroyd B; Hind K
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(3):375-382. PubMed ID: 28462788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Total body and regional bone mineral densitometry (BMD) and soft tissue measurements: correlations of BMD parameter to lumbar spine and hip.
Franck H; Munz M
Calcif Tissue Int; 2000 Aug; 67(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 10920214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: upgrading from a Hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000.
Faulkner KG; Glüer CC; Estilo M; Genant HK
Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 Feb; 52(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 8443695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short term in vivo precision of whole body composition measurements on the Horizon A densitometer.
Nowitz M; Monahan P
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2018 Apr; 62(2):179-182. PubMed ID: 28755448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Axial and total-body bone densitometry using a narrow-angle fan-beam.
Mazess RB; Hanson JA; Payne R; Nord R; Wilson M
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 10793875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Precision and accuracy of measurements of whole-body bone mineral: comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
Tothill P; Avenell A; Reid DM
Br J Radiol; 1994 Dec; 67(804):1210-7. PubMed ID: 7874420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cross calibration of QDR-2000 and QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray densitometers for bone mineral and soft-tissue measurements.
Abrahamsen B; Gram J; Hansen TB; Beck-Nielsen H
Bone; 1995 Mar; 16(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 7786643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anomalies in the measurement of changes in total-body bone mineral by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry during weight change.
Tothill P; Hannan WJ; Cowen S; Freeman CP
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Nov; 12(11):1908-21. PubMed ID: 9383696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
