BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8696694)

  • 21. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.
    Kuhl CK; Schild HH; Morakkabati N
    Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):789-800. PubMed ID: 16118161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Half-Fourier, three-dimensional technique for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of both breasts and axillae: initial characterization of breast lesions.
    Perman WH; Heiberg EV; Herrmann VM
    Radiology; 1996 Jul; 200(1):263-9. PubMed ID: 8657924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of breast cancer recurrence with contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging: preliminary results in 26 patients.
    Gilles R; Guinebretière JM; Shapeero LG; Lesnik A; Contesso G; Sarrazin D; Masselot J; Vanel D
    Radiology; 1993 Aug; 188(2):473-8. PubMed ID: 8327700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Focal and diffuse lesions in dynamic MR-mammography of healthy probands].
    Kuhl CK; Seibert C; Sommer T; Kreft B; Gieseke J; Schild HH
    Rofo; 1995 Sep; 163(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 7548868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [MR mammography at 0.5 tesla. II. The capacity to differentiate malignant and benign lesions in MR mammography at 0.5 and 1.5 T].
    Kuhl CK; Kreft BP; Hauswirth A; Gieseke J; Elevelt A; Reiser M; Schild HH
    Rofo; 1995 Jun; 162(6):482-91. PubMed ID: 7605960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dynamic three-dimensional imaging with partial k-space sampling: initial application for gadolinium-enhanced rate characterization of breast lesions.
    Chenevert TL; Helvie MA; Aisen AM; Francis IR; Adler DD; Roubidoux MA; Londy FJ
    Radiology; 1995 Jul; 196(1):135-42. PubMed ID: 7784556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations.
    Heywang SH; Wolf A; Pruss E; Hilbertz T; Eiermann W; Permanetter W
    Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 2648479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [MR imaging for breast cancer].
    Seki T; Hachiya J; Nitatori T; Yokoyama K; Fukushima H; Uchigasaki S
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 May; 97(5):347-56. PubMed ID: 8709936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dynamic 3D-MR mammography: is there a benefit of sophisticated evaluation of enhancement curves for clinical routine?
    Müller-Schimpfle M; Ohmenhäuser K; Sand J; Stoll P; Claussen CD
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 7(1):236-40. PubMed ID: 9039622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Combination of low and high resolution T1-weighted sequences for improved evaluation of morphologic criteria in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast].
    Vomweg TW; Teifke A; Schreiber WG; Schmidt M; Thelen M
    Rofo; 2002 Nov; 174(11):1445-9. PubMed ID: 12424673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis.
    Buadu LD; Murakami J; Murayama S; Hashiguchi N; Sakai S; Masuda K; Toyoshima S; Kuroki S; Ohno S
    Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):639-49. PubMed ID: 8756909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Quantitative dynamic contrast breast-MRI with the 0.5 tesla equipment].
    Klengel S; Hietschold V; Schreiber M; Köhler K
    Rontgenpraxis; 1994 Aug; 47(8):223-8. PubMed ID: 7974011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Gadolinium-enhanced breast MRI.
    Kelcz F; Santyr G
    Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1995; 36(4):287-338. PubMed ID: 8845065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sensitivity and specificity of MR mammography with histopathological correlation in 250 breasts.
    Boné B; Aspelin P; Bronge L; Isberg B; Perbeck L; Veress B
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Mar; 37(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 8600964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast.
    Sherif H; Mahfouz AE; Oellinger H; Hadijuana J; Blohmer JU; Taupitz M; Felix R; Hamm B
    Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 9314987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The MRT of the breast with 2D-spin-echo and gradient-echo sequences in diagnostically problematic cases].
    Allgayer B; Lukas P; Loos W; Kersting-Sommerhoff B
    Rofo; 1993 May; 158(5):423-7. PubMed ID: 8490150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Enhanced MRI of breast cancer smaller than 3 cm].
    Ikeda Y; Narabayashi I; Yoshida S; Motohara T; Koizumi T; Ogawa K; Mieda C; Ueda E; Hirota S; Oshitani T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Nov; 51(11):1314-23. PubMed ID: 1662800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A fast 3D-imaging technique for performing dynamic Gd-enhanced MRI of breast lesions.
    Perman WH; Heiberg EM; Grunz J; Herrmann VM; Janney CG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 12(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 8057758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Recurrent rectal cancer: diagnosis with dynamic MR imaging.
    Müller-Schimpfle M; Brix G; Layer G; Schlag P; Engenhart R; Frohmuller S; Hess T; Zuna I; Semmler W; van Kaick G
    Radiology; 1993 Dec; 189(3):881-9. PubMed ID: 8234720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.