These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8696777)

  • 1. Evaluation of recovery filters for use in bacterial retention testing of sterilizing-grade filters.
    Carter J
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1996; 50(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 8696777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of membrane filtration for removal of diminutive bioburden organisms in pharmaceutical products and processes.
    Sundaram S; Auriemma M; Howard G; Brandwein H; Leo F
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1999; 53(4):186-201. PubMed ID: 10754712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the Effect of the Volume Throughput and Maximum Flux of Low-Surface-Tension Fluids on Bacterial Penetration of 0.2 Micron-Rated Filters during Process-Specific Filter Validation Testing.
    Folmsbee M
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2015; 69(2):307-16. PubMed ID: 25868996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part III: bacterial challenge tests on 0.2/0.22 and 0.1 micron rated filter cartridges with Hydrogenophaga (formerly Pseudomonas) pseudoflava.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Lewis M; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(6):393-416. PubMed ID: 11766824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part IV: Retention of hydrogenophaga pseudoflava (ATCC 700892) and Ralstonia pickettii (ATCC 700591) by 0.2 and 0.22 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Lewis M; Eisenhuth J; Howard G; Larson B
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2002; 56(3):150-71. PubMed ID: 12109335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microbial retention characteristics of 0.2-microns-rated nylon membrane filters during filtration of high viscosity fluids at high differential pressure and varied temperatures.
    Aranha H; Meeker J
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1995; 49(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 7780747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention of water-borne bacteria by membrane filters. Part I: Bacterial challenge tests on 0.2 and 0.22 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(2):65-86. PubMed ID: 11310322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practical methods for the microbial validation of sterilizing-grade filters used in aseptic processing.
    MacDonald WD; Pelletier CA; Gasper DL
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1989; 43(6):266-70. PubMed ID: 2689620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Loss of LDH activity during membrane filtration.
    Nema S; Avis KE
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1993; 47(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 8445493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microscopic Characterization of Brevundimonas diminuta in the Hydrated State.
    Harp G; Cho SJ; Lester E; Rose D; Sabanyagam C; Ross SF
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2015; 69(3):355-65. PubMed ID: 26048743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Importance of Accurate Microorganism Identification in Microbial Challenge Tests of Membrane Filters. Part II. The Comparison of Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava ATTC 33668 and Curvibacter sp. ATCC 700892 by Microbial Challenge Tests with Membrane Filters.
    Haake G; Kaesler-Neumann I; Hennig H; Meltzer TH; Jornitz MW
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2012; 66(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 22767883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retention of water-borne bacteria by membrane filters. Part III: Bacterial challenge tests on 0.1 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(2):114-26. PubMed ID: 11310317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sorption of bacterial endotoxin and retention of bacteria by positively charged membrane filters.
    van Doorne H
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1993; 47(5):192-8. PubMed ID: 8263658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part II: preliminary characterization of Hydrogenophaga (formerly Pseudomonas) pseudoflava for use as a standard challenge organism to qualify 0.1 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Steves M; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(6):373-92. PubMed ID: 11766823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benchmarking of Sterilizing-Grade Filter Membranes with Liposome Filtration.
    Singh B; Mundlamuri R; Friese T; Mundrigi A; Handt S; Loewe T
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2018; 72(3):223-235. PubMed ID: 29242392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Membrane filtration of pharmaceutical solutions.
    McKinnon BT; Avis KE
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Sep; 50(9):1921-36. PubMed ID: 8135243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of filter extractables by proton NMR spectroscopy: studies on intact filters with process buffers.
    Kao YH; Bender J; Hagewiesche A; Wong P; Huang Y; Vanderlaan M
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(5):268-77. PubMed ID: 11605250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part I: characterization of water isolates for potential use as standard challenge organisms to qualify 0.1 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(6):346-72. PubMed ID: 11766822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The importance of accurate microorganism identification in microbial challenge tests of membrane filters--part I.
    Kaesler I; Haake G; Hennig H; Rosenhagen A; Meltzer TH; Jornitz MW
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2011; 65(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 21502070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention of water-borne bacteria by membrane filters. Part II: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) characterization of bacterial species recovered downstream of 0.2/0.22 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Mallick S; Eisenhuth J; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(2):87-113. PubMed ID: 11310323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.