141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8696991)
1. The relative diagnostic impact of screening mammography and physical examination.
Taves DH; McCurdy LI; Sparrow RK
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1996 Aug; 47(4):257-9. PubMed ID: 8696991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Early results of breast cancer screening research].
Nowicki A; Stogowska I
Ginekol Pol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17899703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1459-76. PubMed ID: 1423087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive cancer detection in a mammography screening program.
Oestreicher N; Lehman CD; Seger DJ; Buist DS; White E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):428-32. PubMed ID: 15671358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lightscanning versus mammography for the detection of breast cancer in screening and clinical practice. A Swedish multicenter study.
Alveryd A; Andersson I; Aspegren K; Balldin G; Bjurstam N; Edström G; Fagerberg G; Glas U; Jarlman O; Larsson SA
Cancer; 1990 Apr; 65(8):1671-7. PubMed ID: 2180556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Facility Mammography Volume in Relation to Breast Cancer Screening Outcomes.
Onega T; Goldman LE; Walker RL; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Taplin S; Geller BM; Hill DA; Smith-Bindman R
J Med Screen; 2016 Mar; 23(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 26265482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Current management of primary breast cancer. Part I: Screening, diagnosis, staging and local treatment of stage I and II disease.
Lopez MJ; Andriole DP
Mo Med; 1990 Sep; 87(9):684-90. PubMed ID: 2215472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic factors of breast neoplasms detected on screening by mammography and physical examination.
Feig SA; Schwartz GF; Nerlinger R; Edeiken J
Radiology; 1979 Dec; 133(3 Pt 1):577-82. PubMed ID: 504635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tumor size distribution of invasive breast cancers and the sensitivity of screening methods in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
Shaevitch D; Taghipour S; Miller AB; Montgomery N; Harvey B
J Cancer Res Ther; 2017; 13(3):562-569. PubMed ID: 28862227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survival of women ages 40-49 years with breast carcinoma according to method of detection.
McPherson CP; Swenson KK; Jolitz G; Murray CL
Cancer; 1997 May; 79(10):1923-32. PubMed ID: 9149019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Method of tumor detection influences disease-free survival of women with breast carcinoma.
Senie RT; Lesser M; Kinne DW; Rosen PP
Cancer; 1994 Mar; 73(6):1666-72. PubMed ID: 8156494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spectrum of mammographically detected breast cancers.
Sener SF; Winchester DJ; Winchester DP; Kurek R; Motykie G; Martz CH; Rabbitt S
Am Surg; 1999 Aug; 65(8):731-5; discussion 735-6. PubMed ID: 10432082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: 13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50-59 years.
Miller AB; To T; Baines CJ; Wall C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Sep; 92(18):1490-9. PubMed ID: 10995804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved detection rate of early breast cancer in mass screening combined with mammography.
Ohuchi N; Yoshida K; Kimura M; Ouchi A; Kamioki S; Shiiba K; Matoba N; Kojima S; Takahashi K; Matsuno S
Jpn J Cancer Res; 1993 Jul; 84(7):807-12. PubMed ID: 8396569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High detection rate of breast cancer by mass screening using mammography in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Harada K; Sagara Y
Jpn J Cancer Res; 1994 Dec; 85(12):1193-5. PubMed ID: 7852181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: analysis and classification.
Burhenne HJ; Burhenne LW; Goldberg F; Hislop TG; Worth AJ; Rebbeck PM; Kan L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 May; 162(5):1067-71; discussion 1072-5. PubMed ID: 8165983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
