574 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8697321)
1. Combined fine-needle aspiration, physical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses: their relation to outcome for women with primary breast cancer.
Steinberg JL; Trudeau ME; Ryder DE; Fishell E; Chapman JA; McCready DR; Fish EB; Hiraki GY; Ross TM; Lickley LA
Can J Surg; 1996 Aug; 39(4):302-11. PubMed ID: 8697321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A modified triple test for palpable breast masses: the value of ultrasound and core needle biopsy.
Wai CJ; Al-Mubarak G; Homer MJ; Goldkamp A; Samenfeld-Specht M; Lee Y; Logvinenko T; Rothschild JG; Graham RA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):850-5. PubMed ID: 23104707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The value of aspiration cytology within the scope of triple diagnosis of palpable breast changes].
Schuhmann R; Hübner F; Brose C; Eckel S; Geier G; Kraus H; Schöndorf H; Schöndorf NK
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1995 Oct; 55(10):553-8. PubMed ID: 8543127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Triple approach in the diagnosis of dominant breast masses: combined physical examination, mammography, and fine-needle aspiration.
Kaufman Z; Shpitz B; Shapiro M; Rona R; Lew S; Dinbar A
J Surg Oncol; 1994 Aug; 56(4):254-7. PubMed ID: 8057655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Needle aspiration cytology of the breast: current perspective on the role in diagnosis and management].
Kocjan G
Acta Med Croatica; 2008 Oct; 62(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 19205416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of triple test score in the diagnosis of palpable breast lump.
Ghimire B; Khan MI; Bibhusal T; Singh Y; Sayami P
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(172):189-92. PubMed ID: 19079392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fine-needle aspiration in the management of breast masses.
Layfield LJ; Glasgow BJ; Cramer H
Pathol Annu; 1989; 24 Pt 2():23-62. PubMed ID: 2671883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accurate and cost-effective evaluation of breast masses in males.
Vetto J; Schmidt W; Pommier R; DiTomasso J; Eppich H; Wood W; Moseson D
Am J Surg; 1998 May; 175(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 9600283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Triple assessment of breast lump.
Ahmed I; Nazir R; Chaudhary MY; Kundi S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2007 Sep; 17(9):535-8. PubMed ID: 17903400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonimage-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of palpable axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients.
Marti JL; Ayo D; Levine P; Hernandez O; Rescigno J; Axelrod DM
Breast J; 2012; 18(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 22098412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.
Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D
Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can core needle biopsy replace fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of palpable breast carcinoma. A comparative study of 124 women.
Ballo MS; Sneige N
Cancer; 1996 Aug; 78(4):773-7. PubMed ID: 8756371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of the "triple test" for palpable breast lesions yields high diagnostic accuracy and cost savings.
Vetto J; Pommier R; Schmidt W; Wachtel M; DuBois P; Jones M; Thurmond A
Am J Surg; 1995 May; 169(5):519-22. PubMed ID: 7747833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accurate evaluation of palpable breast masses by the triple test score.
Morris A; Pommier RF; Schmidt WA; Shih RL; Alexander PW; Vetto JT
Arch Surg; 1998 Sep; 133(9):930-4. PubMed ID: 9749842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An analysis of fine needle aspiration versus core needle biopsy in clinically palpable breast lesions: a report on the predictive values and a cost comparison.
Nagar S; Iacco A; Riggs T; Kestenberg W; Keidan R
Am J Surg; 2012 Aug; 204(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 22464444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Non palpable lesions of the breast: the Mammotome-biopsy in the preoperative management of breast cancer].
Ceccarelli G; Casciola L; Battistini I; Stefanoni M; Spaziani A; Conti D; Di Zitti L; Valeri R; Bartoli A; Bellochi R; Rambotti M; Pisanelli MC
G Chir; 2005 May; 26(5):187-93. PubMed ID: 16184700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?
Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjaeger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of diagnosis and surgical management of breast lesions in a community hospital: room for improvement?
Hanley C; Kessaram R
Can J Surg; 2006 Jun; 49(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 16749979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of fine needle aspiration for solid breast lesions is accurate and cost-effective.
Rubin M; Horiuchi K; Joy N; Haun W; Read R; Ratzer E; Fenoglio M
Am J Surg; 1997 Dec; 174(6):694-6; discussion 697-8. PubMed ID: 9409599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast imaging and needle biopsy in women with clinically evident breast cancer: does combined imaging change overall diagnostic sensitivity?
Ciatto S; Houssami N
Breast; 2007 Aug; 16(4):382-6. PubMed ID: 17350262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]