These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8698163)

  • 1. Assessing the cognitive demands of speech listening for people with hearing losses.
    Rakerd B; Seitz PF; Whearty M
    Ear Hear; 1996 Apr; 17(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 8698163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EEG activity as an objective measure of cognitive load during effortful listening: A study on pediatric subjects with bilateral, asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss.
    Marsella P; Scorpecci A; Cartocci G; Giannantonio S; Maglione AG; Venuti I; Brizi A; Babiloni F
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Aug; 99():1-7. PubMed ID: 28688548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Cost of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Cognitive Demands on Auditory Functioning in Older Adults With Normal Hearing or Using Hearing Aids.
    Devesse A; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):615-628. PubMed ID: 33027198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.
    Miles K; McMahon C; Boisvert I; Ibrahim R; de Lissa P; Graham P; Lyxell B
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517706396. PubMed ID: 28752807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of cognition and noise reduction on speech perception in adults with unilateral cochlear implants.
    Purdy SC; Welch D; Giles E; Morgan CL; Tenhagen R; Kuruvilla-Mathew A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 May; 18(3):162-170. PubMed ID: 28335695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):600-10. PubMed ID: 24622352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise.
    Anderson Gosselin P; Gagné JP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):944-58. PubMed ID: 21060138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
    Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measures of Listening Effort Are Multidimensional.
    Alhanbali S; Dawes P; Millman RE; Munro KJ
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1084-1097. PubMed ID: 30747742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.
    Gosselin PA; Gagné JP
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 21916790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of hearing and use on speech discrimination and listening effort.
    Downs DW
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1982 May; 47(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 7176597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Behavioral Measures of Listening Effort in School-Age Children: Examining the Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Hearing Loss, and Amplification.
    McGarrigle R; Gustafson SJ; Hornsby BWY; Bess FH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):381-392. PubMed ID: 29905670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Listening effort with cochlear implant simulations.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; Baskent D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1075-84. PubMed ID: 23275424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single-ended prediction of listening effort using deep neural networks.
    Huber R; Krüger M; Meyer BT
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():40-49. PubMed ID: 29373159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.