BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8699517)

  • 1. In vivo evaluation of a CSTi dental implant: a healing time course study.
    Cook SD; Rust-Dawicki AM
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(3):82-90. PubMed ID: 8699517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo evaluation of CSTi dental implants in the presence of ligature-induced peri-implantitis.
    Cook SD; Rust-Dawicki AM
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 8699512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vivo performance of a modified CSTi dental implant coating.
    Story BJ; Wagner WR; Gaisser DM; Cook SD; Rust-Dawicki AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):749-57. PubMed ID: 9857585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preliminary evaluation of titanium-coated PEEK dental implants.
    Cook SD; Rust-Dawicki AM
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 8699511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vivo analysis of an elliptical dental implant design.
    Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Gaisser DM; Wagner WR
    J Oral Implantol; 1993; 19(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 8007024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of surface macrotexture on the mechanical and histologic characteristics of hydroxylapatite-coated dental implants.
    Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Gaisser DM; Wagner WR
    J Oral Implantol; 1993; 19(4):288-94. PubMed ID: 8007021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 (rhOP-1) placed with dental implants in fresh extraction sites.
    Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Rueger DC
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 8699520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone response to titanium implants coated with thin sputtered HA film subject to hydrothermal treatment and implanted in the canine mandible.
    Ozeki K; Okuyama Y; Fukui Y; Aoki H
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(4):243-51. PubMed ID: 16971742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of femoral and mandibular animal models for the evaluation of HA-coated implants.
    Cook SD; Baffes GC; Wolfe MW; Palafox AJ
    J Oral Implantol; 1992; 18(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 1298819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Histologic and histomorphometric comparison of immediately placed hydroxyapatite-coated and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a pilot study in dogs.
    Karabuda C; Sandalli P; Yalcin S; Steflik DE; Parr GR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):510-5. PubMed ID: 10453665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Torsional stability of HA-coated and grit-blasted titanium dental implants.
    Cook SD; Baffes GC; Palafox AJ; Wolfe MW; Burgess A
    J Oral Implantol; 1992; 18(4):354-65. PubMed ID: 1298818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations.
    Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 9857595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone healing at implants with a fluoride-modified surface: an experimental study in dogs.
    Berglundh T; Abrahamsson I; Albouy JP; Lindhe J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17269959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Osseointegration of a hydroxyapatite-coated multilayered mesh stem.
    Kusakabe H; Sakamaki T; Nihei K; Oyama Y; Yanagimoto S; Ichimiya M; Kimura J; Toyama Y
    Biomaterials; 2004 Jul; 25(15):2957-69. PubMed ID: 14967528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of titanium plasma-sprayed and plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite implants in vivo.
    Ong JL; Carnes DL; Bessho K
    Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(19):4601-6. PubMed ID: 15120505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
    Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 9425758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible.
    Novaes AB; Souza SL; de Oliveira PT; Souza AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 12074453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy.
    Weinlaender M; Beumer J; Kenney EB; Lekovic V; Holmes R; Moy PK; Plenk H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
    Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur.
    Park JW; Lee SG; Choi BJ; Suh JY
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.