These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8699519)

  • 21. Evaluation of bone width lateral to the mandibular canal as an alternative approach for implant installation.
    Daróz SR; Cardoso ES; Manso MC; Vidigal GM
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23303270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Surgical templates for prosthetically guided implant placement.
    Meitner SW; Tallents RH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Dec; 92(6):569-74. PubMed ID: 15583564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reconstruction of the moderately atrophic edentulous maxilla with mandibular bone grafts.
    Cordaro L; Boghi F; Mirisola di Torresanto V; Torsello F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1214-21. PubMed ID: 22788219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.
    Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites.
    Todd AD; Gher ME; Quintero G; Richardson AC
    J Periodontol; 1993 Dec; 64(12):1243-9. PubMed ID: 8106953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the effect of the residual bone angulation on implant-supported fixed prostheses in mandibular posterior edentulism. Part I: Spiral computed tomography study.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    Implant Dent; 2001; 10(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 11665371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of residual ridge resorption patterns on fixture placement and tooth position, Part III: Presurgical assessment of ridge augmentation requirements.
    Mecall RA; Rosenfeld AL
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Aug; 16(4):322-37. PubMed ID: 9242100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical evaluations of a porous-surfaced endosseous implant system.
    Heller AL; Heller RL
    J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(3-4):240-6. PubMed ID: 9524502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
    Lam EW; Ruprecht A; Yang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of surgical guide design and surgeon's experience on the accuracy of implant placement.
    Hinckfuss S; Conrad HJ; Lin L; Lunos S; Seong WJ
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Aug; 38(4):311-23. PubMed ID: 20712446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dual-purpose, radiographic-surgical implant template: fabrication technique.
    Walker M; Hansen P
    Gen Dent; 1999; 47(2):206-8. PubMed ID: 10687501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Placement of posterior maxillary implants in partially edentulous patients with severe bone deficiency using CAD/CAM guidance to avoid sinus grafting: a clinical report of procedure.
    Fortin T; Isidori M; Bouchet H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 19344031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of facial and lingual cortical thicknesses in edentulous maxillary and mandibular sites measured on computerized tomograms.
    Flanagan D
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(5):256-8. PubMed ID: 19170291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Planning for implant placement.
    Shepard WK; Ducar JP; London RM
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1995 Mar; 23(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 7673992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An illustrative study of the role of tomograms for the placement of dental implants.
    Thunthy KH; Yeadon WR; Nasr HF
    J Oral Implantol; 2003; 29(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 12760453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement.
    Gher ME; Richardson AC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Jun; 15(3):268-83. PubMed ID: 7558660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. CT in the preoperative assessment of the mandible and maxilla for endosseous implant surgery. Work in progress.
    Rothman SL; Chaftez N; Rhodes ML; Schwarz MS
    Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):171-5. PubMed ID: 3380955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do Implant Surgical Guides Allow an Adequate Zone of Keratinized Tissue for Flapless Surgery?
    Deeb JG; Bencharit S; Loschiavo CA; Yeung M; Laskin D; Deeb GR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 76(12):2540-2550. PubMed ID: 30102877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Rehabilitation of a dentate mandible requiring a full arch rehabilitation. Immediate loading of a fixed complete denture on 8 implants placed with a bone-supported surgical computer-planned guide: a case report.
    Amorfini L; Storelli S; Romeo E
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():106-13. PubMed ID: 21495798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Short implants in maxillary and mandibular rehabilitations: interim results (6 to 42 months) of a prospective study.
    Taschieri S; Corbella S; Molinari R; Saita M; Del Fabbro M
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Feb; 41(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23413769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.