These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8699525)

  • 1. Pilot-hole preparation for proper implant positioning and the enhancement of bone formation.
    Horiuchi M; Ichikawa T; Kanitani HWigianto R; Kawamoto N; Matsumoto N
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8699525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach.
    Natali AN; Pavan PG; Ruggero AL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16441786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The experimental verification of the efficacy of finite element modeling to dental implant systems.
    Baiamonte T; Abbate MF; Pizzarello F; Lozada J; James R
    J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 9151632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
    Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
    Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dental implants press fit phenomena: biomechanical analysis considering bone inelastic response.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG
    Dent Mater; 2009 May; 25(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 19128827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Step-wise analysis of the dental implant insertion process using the finite element technique.
    van Staden RC; Guan H; Johnson NW; Loo YC; Meredith N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):303-13. PubMed ID: 18081871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical rationale for intentionally inclined implants in the posterior mandible using 3D finite element analysis.
    Satoh T; Maeda Y; Komiyama Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(4):533-9. PubMed ID: 16161737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca fascicularis.
    Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Swaminathan D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 11858574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-dimensional FEM analysis of hydroxyapatite implants: diameter effects on stress distribution.
    Matsushita Y; Kitoh M; Mizuta K; Ikeda H; Suetsugu T
    J Oral Implantol; 1990; 16(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 2074593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A numerical approach to resonance frequency analysis for the investigation of oral implant osseointegration.
    Natali AN; Pavan PG; Schileo E; Williams KR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Sep; 33(9):674-81. PubMed ID: 16922741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kong L; Hu K; Li D; Song Y; Yang J; Wu Z; Liu B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18416414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A finite element stress analysis of the transmandibular implant system.
    Williams KR; Murphy WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 11843446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of bone inelastic response in interaction phenomena with dental implants.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 18207565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
    Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths.
    Bevilacqua M; Tealdo T; Pera F; Menini M; Mossolov A; Drago C; Pera P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 19149073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.