These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8699641)

  • 1. [The effect of stimulus-driven factor on attentional capture: evidence from visual search paradigm containing static and dynamic stimuli].
    Kawahara J
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1996 Apr; 67(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 8699641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus-driven attentional capture by equiluminant color change.
    Lu S; Zhou K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Jun; 12(3):567-72. PubMed ID: 16235647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 30276609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Salient-but-irrelevant stimuli cause attentional capture in difficult, but attentional suppression in easy visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1826-1838. PubMed ID: 28752665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bottom-up attention capture with distractor and target singletons defined in the same (color) dimension is not a matter of feature uncertainty.
    Weichselbaum H; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1350-1361. PubMed ID: 29777515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28681179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus-driven attentional capture by a static discontinuity between perceptual groups.
    Burnham BR; Neely JH; Naginsky Y; Thomas M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):317-29. PubMed ID: 20364921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bottom-up and top-down control in visual search.
    van Zoest W; Donk M
    Perception; 2004; 33(8):927-37. PubMed ID: 15521692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of eccentricity on attentional capture.
    van Heusden E; Olivers CNL; Donk M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Feb; 86(2):422-438. PubMed ID: 37258897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.
    Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L
    Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes.
    Berry JH
    Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():31-40. PubMed ID: 23385060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional capture by the onset and offset of motion signals outside the spatial focus of attention.
    Kawahara J; Yanase K; Kitazaki M
    J Vis; 2012 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 23161003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional capture is modulated by stimulus saliency in visual search as evidenced by event-related potentials and alpha oscillations.
    Forschack N; Gundlach C; Hillyard S; Müller MM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):685-704. PubMed ID: 36525202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features.
    Gibson BS; Kelsey EM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 9627409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional capture by spatiotemporally task-irrelevant faces: supportive evidence for Sato and Kawahara (2015).
    Ariga A; Arihara K
    Psychol Res; 2018 Sep; 82(5):859-865. PubMed ID: 28455652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention.
    Hickey C; McDonald JJ; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):604-13. PubMed ID: 16768363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.