619 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8700030)
1. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proton dosimetry intercomparison.
Vatnitsky S; Siebers J; Miller D; Moyers M; Schaefer M; Jones D; Vynckier S; Hayakawa Y; Delacroix S; Isacsson U; Medin J; Kacperek A; Lomax A; Coray A; Kluge H; Heese J; Verhey L; Daftari I; Gall K; Lam G; Beck T; Hartmann G
Radiother Oncol; 1996 Nov; 41(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 9004361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Almond PR; Biggs PJ; Coursey BM; Hanson WF; Huq MS; Nath R; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1999 Sep; 26(9):1847-70. PubMed ID: 10505874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Calorimetric determination of the absorbed dose-to-water beam quality correction factor kQ for high-energy photon beams.
Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1749-52. PubMed ID: 8587528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
Araki F; Kubo HD
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deduction of the air w value in a therapeutic proton beam.
Siebers JV; Vatnitsky SM; Miller DW; Moyers MF
Phys Med Biol; 1995 Aug; 40(8):1339-56. PubMed ID: 7480117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electron beam water calorimetry measurements to obtain beam quality conversion factors.
Muir BR; Cojocaru CD; McEwen MR; Ross CK
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5433-5444. PubMed ID: 28688120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental determination of beam quality factors, kQ, for two types of Farmer chamber in a 10 MV photon and a 175 MeV proton beam.
Medin J; Ross CK; Klassen NV; Palmans H; Grusell E; Grindborg JE
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1503-21. PubMed ID: 16510959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Proton dosimetry intercomparison based on the ICRU report 59 protocol.
Vatnitsky S; Moyers M; Miller D; Abell G; Slater JM; Pedroni E; Coray A; Mazal A; Newhauser W; Jaekel O; Heese J; Fukumura A; Futami Y; Verhey L; Daftari I; Grusell E; Molokanov A; Bloch C
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Jun; 51(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 10435822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB
Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Absorbed-dose beam quality conversion factors for cylindrical chambers in high energy photon beams.
Seuntjens JP; Ross CK; Shortt KR; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2763-79. PubMed ID: 11190960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The advantages of absorbed-dose calibration factors.
Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1992; 19(5):1227-39. PubMed ID: 1435604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Proton beam monitor chamber calibration.
Gomà C; Lorentini S; Meer D; Safai S
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Sep; 59(17):4961-71. PubMed ID: 25109620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monte Carlo calculations for reference dosimetry of electron beams with the PTW Roos and NE2571 ion chambers.
Muir BR; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121722. PubMed ID: 24320508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementation of water calorimetry in a 180 MeV scanned pulsed proton beam including an experimental determination of kQ for a Farmer chamber.
Medin J
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(12):3287-98. PubMed ID: 20484778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental validation of beam quality correction factors for proton beams.
Gomà C; Hofstetter-Boillat B; Safai S; Vörös S
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3207-16. PubMed ID: 25813370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Consistency in reference radiotherapy dosimetry: resolution of an apparent conundrum when (60)Co is the reference quality for charged-particle and photon beams.
Andreo P; Wulff J; Burns DT; Palmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6593-621. PubMed ID: 24018471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
