These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability. Hannig M; Friedrichs C Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents. Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative SEM and TEM observations of nanoleakage within the hybrid layer. Sano H; Yoshiyama M; Ebisu S; Burrow MF; Takatsu T; Ciucchi B; Carvalho R; Pashley DH Oper Dent; 1995; 20(4):160-7. PubMed ID: 8700785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations. Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal hybrid layer in Class V restorations. Prati C; Pashley DH; Chersoni S; Mongiorgi R Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 11203821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations. Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nanoleakage of dentin adhesive systems bonded to Carisolv-treated dentin. Kubo S; Li H; Burrow MF; Tyas MJ Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):387-95. PubMed ID: 12120777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term durability of resin dentin interface: nanoleakage vs. microtensile bond strength. Okuda M; Pereira PN; Nakajima M; Tagami J; Pashley DH Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 12022462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations. Owens BM J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. Swift EJ; Triolo PT; Barkmeier WW; Bird JL; Bounds SJ Am J Dent; 1996 Jun; 9(3):100-4. PubMed ID: 9002798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of wet and dry bonding techniques on marginal leakage. Santini A; Mitchell S Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):219-24. PubMed ID: 10388380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of dentin conditioning time on nanoleakage. Duarte S; Perdigão J; Lopes MM Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):500-11. PubMed ID: 16924992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems. Ramos RP; Chinelatti MA; Chimello DT; Dibb RG Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):450-6. PubMed ID: 12073726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of multiple application of a dentin adhesive on contraction gap width of a resin-based composite. Koike T; Hasegawa T; Itoh K; Yukitani W; Yamashita T; Wakumoto S; Hisamitsu H Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 12469752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives. Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Leakage pathway of Class V cavities restored with different flowable resin composite restorations. Awliya WY; El-Sahn AM Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 18335730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nanoleakage, ultramorphological characteristics, and microtensile bond strengths of a new low-shrinkage composite to dentin after artificial aging. Duarte S; Phark JH; Varjão FM; Sadan A Dent Mater; 2009 May; 25(5):589-600. PubMed ID: 19101716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]