These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8700764)

  • 21. Marginal adaptation and micro-porosity of class II restorations of a high copper amalgam and a palladium-free gallium-based alloy.
    Shaini FJ; Wahab FK; Ellakwa AE; Shortall AC; Fleming GJ; Marquis PM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):924-33. PubMed ID: 17168935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Criteria for choice of an alloy for dental amalgams].
    De Valkeneer I; Bercy P
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1990 Jun; 44(170):219-36. PubMed ID: 2088017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.
    Rahimtoola S; van Amerongen E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):16-26, 11. PubMed ID: 12119808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Zinc-containing high copper amalgams: a 3-year clinical evaluation.
    Osborne JW; Berry TG
    Am J Dent; 1992 Feb; 5(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 1524742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams.
    Mair LH
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):483-90. PubMed ID: 9807127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations.
    Burgess JO; Alvarez A; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fracture resistance of Class II approximal slot restorations.
    Yaman SD; Yetmez M; Türköz E; Akkas N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 11005902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study).
    Kamel FM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fracture strength of amalgam crowns with repaired endodontic access.
    Hachmeister KA; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF; Larsen RB
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 12022456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
    Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Microleakage of dentin/amalgam alloy bonding agents: results after 1 year.
    Meiers JC; Turner EW
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 9610330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Expansion of contaminated amalgams assessed by photoelastic resin.
    Osborne JW
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Oct; 30(10):673-81. PubMed ID: 10765851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Marginal failure of amalgam. Effect of alloy selection and bite forces.
    Dérand T
    Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 6576493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of rubber dam isolation on restoration deterioration.
    Smales RJ
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):277-9. PubMed ID: 1299257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A six year follow-up of three dental alloy restorations with different copper contents.
    van Dijken JW
    Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(6):259-64. PubMed ID: 1817352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A practice-based, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative: one-year results.
    Wilson MA; Cowan AJ; Randall RC; Crisp RJ; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 12216558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of the amalgam alloy on the survival of amalgam restorations: a secondary analysis of multiple controlled clinical trials.
    Letzel H; van 't Hof MA; Marshall GW; Marshall SJ
    J Dent Res; 1997 Nov; 76(11):1787-98. PubMed ID: 9372797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.