These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8700764)

  • 41. Handling characteristics of a palladium-free gallium-based alloy compared with a high copper dental amalgam in a simulated clinical trial.
    Shaini FJ; Shortall AC; Ellakwa AE; Marquis PM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Nov; 28(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 11722719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Study regarding coronal fracture probability in posterior amalgam restorations].
    Andrian S; Iovan G; Oncea C; Teodorovici P; Hasna M
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2006; 110(3):692-7. PubMed ID: 17571568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Three-year clinical performance of eight amalgam alloys.
    Osborne JW
    Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):157-9. PubMed ID: 2076241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Longevity of cusp-covered amalgams: survivals after 15 years.
    Smales RJ
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 1784534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations.
    Sarrett DC
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 15680997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Longevity of conventional and bonded (sealed) amalgam restorations in a private general dental practice.
    Bonsor SJ; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2009 Jan; 206(2):E3; discussion 88-9. PubMed ID: 19148188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Clinical evaluation of multiple-surface ART restorations: 12 month follow-up.
    Cefaly DF; Barata TJ; Bresciani E; Fagundes TC; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2007; 74(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 18482515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Fracture resistance of premolars with bonded class II amalgams.
    Dias de Souza GM; Pereira GD; Dias CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 12120771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical evaluation of gallium alloy as a posterior restorative material.
    Navarro MF; Franco EB; Bastos PA; Teixeira LC; Carvalho RM
    Quintessence Int; 1996 May; 27(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 8941813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Use of inductively coupled plasma-emission spectroscopy and mercury vapor analyses to evaluate elemental release from a high-copper dental amalgam: a pilot study.
    Cohen BI; Penugonda B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):409-12. PubMed ID: 11319540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An in-vitro investigation of variables influencing mercury vapor release from dental amalgam.
    Neme AL; Maxson BB; Linger JB; Abbott LJ
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 11817472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Alloy particle shape and sensitivity of high-copper amalgams to manipulative variables.
    Brown IH; Miller DR
    Am J Dent; 1993 Oct; 6(5):248-54. PubMed ID: 7880469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
    Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of wear and clinical performance between amalgam, composite and open sandwich restorations: 2-year results.
    Sachdeo A; Gray GB; Sulieman MA; Jagger DC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 15058177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Fracture resistance of amalgam/glass-polyalkenoate open sandwich Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Roberts HW; Vandewalle KS; Charlton DG; Berzins DW
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):873-7. PubMed ID: 18692947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Corrosion potential variation of aged dental amalgam restorations over time.
    Sutow EJ; Maillet WA; Hall GC
    Dent Mater; 2006 Apr; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 16084580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of lining materials on shear bond strength of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations.
    Ng BP; Purton DG; Hood JA
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):113-20. PubMed ID: 9656921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Direct-placement gallium restorative alloy: a 3-year clinical evaluation.
    Osborne JW; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Jan; 30(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 10323158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12762613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effect of bonded amalgam restorations on microleakage.
    Al-Jazairy YH; Louka AN
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 10823065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.