327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8700773)
1. Microleakage of class 2 Superbond-lined composite restorations with and without a cervical amalgam base.
Hovav S; Holan G; Lewinstein I; Fuks AB
Oper Dent; 1995; 20(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 8700773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using dentin bonding system primers.
Berry FA; Parker SD; Rice D; Muñoz CA
Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):174-8. PubMed ID: 9002794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on Class II composite restorations.
Chuang SF; Jin YT; Liu JK; Chang CH; Shieh DB
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 15195731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of lining materials on microleakage and internal voids of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
Chuang SF; Jin YT; Lin TS; Chang CH; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 12797564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
Owens BM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer.
Sidhu SK; Henderson LJ
Oper Dent; 1992; 17(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1437685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro marginal leakage of Class II composite resin restorations by thermal cycling.
Futatsuki M; Nakata M
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994; 18(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 8054304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage and wall adaptation of conservative restorations.
Guelmann M; Bonnin S; Primosch RE; Söderholm KJ
Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):407-11. PubMed ID: 12691279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of internal bevel on marginal leakage at the approximal surface of Class 2 composite restorations.
Holan G; Eidelman E; Wright GZ
Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):217-21. PubMed ID: 9484144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microleakage in primary teeth restored by conventional or bonded amalgam technique.
Myaki SI; Rodrigues CR; Raggio DP; Flores TA; Matson MR
Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 11696918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of placement techniques on the marginal adaptation of Class V composite restorations.
Sensi LG; Marson FC; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Junior S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Nov; 6(4):17-25. PubMed ID: 16299603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of Class II combined amalgam-composite restorations in primary molars after 6 to 30 months.
Holan G; Chosack A; Eidelman E
ASDC J Dent Child; 1996; 63(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 8958346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
