These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8700783)

  • 1. Reduction of marginal gaps in composite restorations by use of glass-ceramic inserts.
    George LA; Richards ND; Eichmiller FC
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(4):151-4. PubMed ID: 8700783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage of resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts.
    Olmez A; Oztaş N; Bilici S
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):725-9. PubMed ID: 10200722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro marginal leakage around Class II resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts.
    Coli P; Derhami K; Brännström M
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Nov; 28(11):755-60. PubMed ID: 9573868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ceramic inserts do not generally improve resin composite margins.
    Strobel WO; Petschelt A; Kemmoona M; Frankenberger R
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Aug; 32(8):606-13. PubMed ID: 16011640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two-year performance of glass-ceramic insert-resin composite restorations: clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation.
    Kiremitçi A; Bolay S; Gürgan S
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jul; 29(7):417-21. PubMed ID: 9759057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
    Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal microleakage around class V cavities restored with glass ceramic inserts of different coefficients of thermal expansion.
    Tan CL; Santini A
    J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 15974221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage reduction using glass-ceramic inserts.
    Godder B; Zhukovsky L; Trushkowsky R; Epelboym D
    Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):74-6. PubMed ID: 8054188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal adaptation of resin-bonded light-cured glass ionomers in dentin cavities.
    Fritz UB; Finger WJ; Uno S
    Am J Dent; 1996 Dec; 9(6):253-8. PubMed ID: 9545879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of bulk insertion, prepolymerized resin composite balls, and beta-quartz inserts on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Applequist EA; Meiers JC
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Apr; 27(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 8941843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts.
    Rada RE
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):793-8. PubMed ID: 20830892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal adaptation of ceramic inserts after cementation.
    Ozcan M; Pfeiffer P; Nergiz I
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 11931135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Polymerization shrinkage: effects of constraint and filling technique in composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD; Reis A; Ballester RY
    Dent Mater; 2004 Mar; 20(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 15209228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A 3-year follow-up study of preformed beta-quartz glass-ceramic insert restorations.
    Sjögren G; Hedlund SO; Jonsson C; Sandström A
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jan; 31(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 11203902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.