198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8703178)
1. The purpose of advance medical planning--autonomy for patients or limitation of care?
Levinsky NG
N Engl J Med; 1996 Sep; 335(10):741-3. PubMed ID: 8703178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Advance directives. The next generation.
Rich BA
J Leg Med; 1998 Mar; 19(1):63-97. PubMed ID: 9564095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Accepting the consequences of a treatment-refusal decision.
Moore DL
Bioeth Bull; 1995; 4(2):13-7. PubMed ID: 11822418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Doctors often fail to heed wishes of the dying patient.
Gilbert S
N Y Times Web; 1995 Nov; ():A1, C7. PubMed ID: 11647685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Looking beyond the law to improve end-of-life care.
Zuckerman C
Generations; 1999; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17144036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The medical futility police: head 'em off at the impasse.
Mayo TW
Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):23-6, 36. PubMed ID: 7950140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Approaches (and possible contraindications) to enhancing patients' autonomy.
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(3):179-88. PubMed ID: 7841467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. On advancing advance directives. Why should we believe the promise?
McIntyre KM
Arch Intern Med; 1995 Nov; 155(21):2271-3. PubMed ID: 7487250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Advance directives and the refusal of treatment.
Hackler C
Med Law; 1989; 7(5):457-65. PubMed ID: 2493552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Euthanasia: the new family planning, part II.
Marker RL
Int Rev Nat Fam Plann; 1987; 11(2):95-131. PubMed ID: 11649868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The right to die.
Powell JA; Cohen AS
Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 7960664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Advanced directives. In search of self-determination.
Flarey DL
J Nurs Adm; 1991 Nov; 21(11):16-22. PubMed ID: 1941165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Difficult decisions. Respecting a patient's right to refuse treatment.
Hall SA
JEMS; 1994 May; 19(5):11-3. PubMed ID: 10133764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Life and death choices after Cruzan: case law and standards of professional conduct.
Gostin L; Weir RF
Milbank Q; 1991; 69(1):143-73. PubMed ID: 2034182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical and legal issues in the care of the elderly cancer patient.
Thomasma DC
Clin Geriatr Med; 1987 Aug; 3(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 3308049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective autonomy: on the limits of shaping one's postcompetence medical fate.
Cantor NL
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():13-48. PubMed ID: 10118983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The ultimate test of autonomy: should minors have a right to make decisions regarding life-sustaining treatment?
Rosato JL
Rutgers Law Rev; 1996; 49(1):1-103. PubMed ID: 11865878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Advance medical directives: policy perspectives and practical experiences.
Weinberg JK; Brod M
J Ethics Law Aging; 1995; 1(1):15-35. PubMed ID: 11654484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Setting limits in the dying zone: assisted suicide, scarce resources, and hard cases.
Furrow BR
Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1995; 72(4):901-26. PubMed ID: 11654374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: what's to be learned from outcomes research?
Danis M
New Horiz; 1998 Feb; 6(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 9508265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
