These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8703278)

  • 1. Effectiveness estimates for center high mounted stop lamps: a six-year study.
    Farmer CM
    Accid Anal Prev; 1996 Mar; 28(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 8703278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Capturing attention to brake lamps.
    McIntyre SE
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):691-6. PubMed ID: 18329422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of Center High Mounted Stop Lamp (CHMSL) on rear-end accidents in Israel.
    Bar-Gera H; Schechtman E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 May; 37(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 15784207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates.
    Cicchino JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):142-152. PubMed ID: 27898367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the crash mitigation effect of low-speed automated emergency braking systems based on insurance claims data.
    Isaksson-Hellman I; Lindman M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():42-7. PubMed ID: 27586101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real-world effects of rear cross-traffic alert on police-reported backing crashes.
    Cicchino JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():350-355. PubMed ID: 30580146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effectiveness of side marker lamps: an experimental study.
    Theeuwes J; Alferdinck JW
    Accid Anal Prev; 1997 Mar; 29(2):235-45. PubMed ID: 9088363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forward collision warning system impact.
    Hubele N; Kennedy K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S78-S83. PubMed ID: 30001148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of rearview cameras and rear parking sensors on police-reported backing crashes.
    Cicchino JB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Nov; 18(8):859-865. PubMed ID: 28394632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A farewell to brake reaction times? Kinematics-dependent brake response in naturalistic rear-end emergencies.
    Markkula G; Engström J; Lodin J; Bärgman J; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):209-26. PubMed ID: 27450793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of side air bags in reducing driver deaths in driver-side collisions.
    Braver ER; Kyrychenko SY
    Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Mar; 159(6):556-64. PubMed ID: 15003959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness of antilock braking systems in reducing accidents in Great Britain.
    Broughton J; Baughan C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2002 May; 34(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 11939364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fleet study evaluation of an advance brake warning system.
    Shinar D
    Hum Factors; 2000; 42(3):482-9. PubMed ID: 11132809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of a low-speed automatic brake system estimated from real life data.
    Isaksson-Hellman I; Lindman M
    Ann Adv Automot Med; 2012; 56():231-40. PubMed ID: 23169133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A collision model for safety evaluation of autonomous intelligent cruise control.
    Touran A; Brackstone MA; McDonald M
    Accid Anal Prev; 1999 Sep; 31(5):567-78. PubMed ID: 10440554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects on accidents of compulsory use of daytime running lights for cars in Norway.
    Elvik R
    Accid Anal Prev; 1993 Aug; 25(4):383-98. PubMed ID: 8357452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. IIHS head restraint ratings and insurance injury claim rates.
    Trempel RE; Zuby DS; Edwards MA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Aug; 17(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 26765782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.