These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8703280)

  • 1. The influence of seat-back and head-restraint properties on the head-neck motion during rear-impact.
    Svensson MY; Lövsund P; Håland Y; Larsson S
    Accid Anal Prev; 1996 Mar; 28(2):221-7. PubMed ID: 8703280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Average male and female virtual dummy model (BioRID and EvaRID) simulations with two seat concepts in the Euro NCAP low severity rear impact test configuration.
    Linder A; Holmqvist K; Svensson MY
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 May; 114():62-70. PubMed ID: 28622848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An energy-absorbing sliding seat for reducing neck injury risks in rear impact--analysis for prototype built.
    Zhang X; Zhou Q
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016; 17(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 26148123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of a 3-point harness restraint and car seat in whiplash-type lateral impacts.
    Kumar S; Ferrari R; Narayan Y; Jones T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jan; 31(1):E11-8. PubMed ID: 16395161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationships between seat properties and human subject kinematics in rear impact tests.
    Welcher JB; Szabo TJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2001 May; 33(3):289-304. PubMed ID: 11235791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic performances of different seat designs for low to medium velocity rear impact.
    Linder A; Olsson T; Truedsson N; Morris A; Fildes B; Sparke L
    Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2001; 45():187-201. PubMed ID: 12214349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of seat properties on occupant dynamics in severe rear crashes.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Dec; 4(4):324-36. PubMed ID: 14630581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of seat foam and geometrical properties on BioRID P3 kinematic response to rear impacts.
    Szabo TJ; Voss DP; Welcher JB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Dec; 4(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 14630580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. BioRID dummy responses in matched ABTS and conventional seat tests on the IIHS rear sled.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Aug; 12(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 21823942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of standing or seated pelvis on dummy responses in rear impacts.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():423-31. PubMed ID: 22269526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does knowledge of seat design and whiplash injury mechanisms translate to understanding outcomes?
    Ivancic PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25 Suppl):S187-93. PubMed ID: 22020611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of head restraints and seat belts on the incidence of neck injury in car accidents.
    Olney DB; Marsden AK
    Injury; 1986 Nov; 17(6):365-7. PubMed ID: 3818065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The response of human volunteers to rear-end impacts: the effect of head restraint properties.
    Tencer AF; Mirza S; Bensel K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Nov; 26(22):2432-40; discussion 2441-2. PubMed ID: 11707705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seat properties affecting neck responses in rear crashes: a reason why whiplash has increased.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Sep; 4(3):214-27. PubMed ID: 14522646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of initial seated position in low speed rear-end impacts: a comparison with the TNO rear impact dummy (TRID) model.
    Venkataramana MP; Hans SA; Bawab SY; Keifer OP; Woodhouse ML; Layson PD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Mar; 6(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 15823879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rear-impact neck protection devices for adult wheelchair users.
    Simms CK; Madden B; Fitzpatrick D; Tiernan J
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(4):499-514. PubMed ID: 19882485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Internal loads in the cervical spine during motor vehicle rear-end impacts: the effect of acceleration and head-to-head restraint proximity.
    Tencer AF; Mirza S; Bensel K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jan; 27(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 11805633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. WHIPS seat and occupant motions during simulated rear crashes.
    Xiao M; Ivancic PC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2010 Oct; 11(5):514-21. PubMed ID: 20872308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical status after neck sprains in frontal and rear-end car impacts.
    Bunketorp OB; Elisson LK
    Injury; 2012 Apr; 43(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 21683356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk of concussion due to head acceleration in rear impact sled tests of passenger automobile seats.
    Courtney A; Campbell IC; Courtney E; Pasquesi SA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S133-S135. PubMed ID: 30841805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.