These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8703326)
1. Evaluating the dose to the contralateral breast when using a dynamic wedge versus a regular wedge. Weides CD; Mok EC; Chang WC; Findley DO; Shostak CA Med Dosim; 1995; 20(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 8703326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dose to the contralateral breast: a comparison of two techniques using the enhanced dynamic wedge versus a standard wedge. Warlick WB; O'Rear JH; Earley L; Moeller JH; Gaffney DK; Leavitt DD Med Dosim; 1997; 22(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 9307948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dose to contralateral breast: a comparison of four primary breast irradiation techniques. Kelly CA; Wang XY; Chu JC; Hartsell WF Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Feb; 34(3):727-32. PubMed ID: 8621298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of a dynamic wedge in the medial tangential field upon the contralateral breast dose. McParland BJ Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1990 Dec; 19(6):1515-20. PubMed ID: 2262375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose to the contralateral breast due to primary breast irradiation. Fraass BA; Roberson PL; Lichter AS Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1985 Mar; 11(3):485-97. PubMed ID: 3972661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A mobile shield to reduce scatter radiation to the contralateral breast during radiotherapy for breast cancer: preclinical results. Sohn JW; Macklis R; Suh JH; Kupelian P Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Mar; 43(5):1037-41. PubMed ID: 10192352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scatter dose from tangential breast irradiation to the uninvolved breast. Muller-Runkel R; Kalokhe UP Radiology; 1990 Jun; 175(3):873-6. PubMed ID: 2343139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MEASUREMENT OF THE CONTRALATERAL BREAST PHOTON AND THERMAL NEUTRON DOSES IN BREAST CANCER RADIOTHERAPY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN PHYSICAL AND DYNAMIC WEDGES. Bagheri H; Rabie Mahdavi S; Shekarchi B; Manouchehri F; Farhood B Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Jan; 178(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 28591863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Active minimisation of radiation scatter during breast radiotherapy: management implications for young patients with good-prognosis primary neoplasms. Epstein RJ; Kelly SA; Cook M; Bateman A; Paddick I; Kam KC; Dunn P; Hanham IW; Dale RG; Price PM Radiother Oncol; 1996 Jul; 40(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 8844891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surface and peripheral doses of dynamic and physical wedges. Li Z; Klein EE Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(4):921-5. PubMed ID: 9128970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multileaf field-in-field forward-planned intensity-modulated dose compensation for whole-breast irradiation is associated with reduced contralateral breast dose: a phantom model comparison. Borghero YO; Salehpour M; McNeese MD; Stovall M; Smith SA; Johnson J; Perkins GH; Strom EA; Oh JL; Kirsner SM; Woodward WA; Yu TK; Buchholz TA Radiother Oncol; 2007 Mar; 82(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 17157944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose to contralateral breast--a comparative study. Brooks PS Med Dosim; 1995; 20(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 8703328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Method for reducing scatter radiation dose to the contralateral breast during tangential breast irradiation therapy. Muller-Runkel R; Kalokhe UP Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):853-5. PubMed ID: 8184078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces the dose to the contralateral breast when compared to conventional tangential fields for primary breast irradiation. Bhatnagar AK; Brandner E; Sonnik D; Wu A; Kalnicki S; Deutsch M; Heron DE Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Mar; 96(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16244787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 4 MV photon surface dose among Varian, Siemens, and Elekta linear accelerators for tangential breast treatment: a phantom study. Yamaguchi S; Karasawa K; Furuya T; Fujita T; Tutumi Y; Miura K; Takada T; Ito K; Ozawa S Radiat Med; 2007 Jan; 25(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 17225047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contralateral breast doses measured by film dosimetry: tangential techniques and an optimized IMRT technique. Saur S; Fjellsboe LM; Lindmo T; Frengen J Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4743-58. PubMed ID: 19622854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment and minimization of contralateral breast dose for conventional and intensity modulated breast radiotherapy. Burmeister J; Alvarado N; Way S; McDermott P; Bossenberger T; Jaenisch H; Patel R; Washington T Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 18262117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simple shielding reduces dose to the contralateral breast during prone breast cancer radiotherapy. Goyal U; Locke A; Smith-Raymond L; Georgiev GN Med Dosim; 2016; 41(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 26994826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of contralateral breast dose and risk estimate of radiation-induced contralateral breast cancer among young women using tangential fields and different modes of breathing. Zurl B; Stranzl H; Winkler P; Kapp KS Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Feb; 85(2):500-5. PubMed ID: 22633190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved dose distribution with a universal acrylic breast compensator. Johnson JM; Potish RA; Khan FM Med Dosim; 1996; 21(3):127-32. PubMed ID: 8899675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]