83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8705358)
1. Small group practices. Part 3: The mother's perspective.
Warwick C
Mod Midwife; 1995 Dec; 5(12):19. PubMed ID: 8705358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Small group practices. Part 1: The manager's perspective.
Warwick C
Mod Midwife; 1995 Oct; 5(10):22-3. PubMed ID: 7583405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Small group practices. Part 2: The midwife's perspective.
Warwick C
Mod Midwife; 1995 Nov; 5(11):22-3. PubMed ID: 7583417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Eight midwives: balance in practice.
Jonquil SG
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 1999; (49):19-20. PubMed ID: 10488309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A midwifery team for high-risk pregnancies.
Bradshaw C; Lewis P; Steer P
Mod Midwife; 1995 May; 5(5):26-9. PubMed ID: 7780759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The demise of a midwifery group practice ... something works well for mothers and midwives: let's axe it!
Head P
Pract Midwife; 2000 Jan; 3(1):30-1. PubMed ID: 11029953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Antenatal, delivery and postnatal comparisons of maternal satisfaction with two pilot Changing Childbirth schemes compared with a traditional model of care.
Spurgeon P; Hicks C; Barwell F
Midwifery; 2001 Jun; 17(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 11399133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A mother's experience of Edgware Birth Centre.
Kweik K
Pract Midwife; 1999 Jun; 2(6):11. PubMed ID: 10481668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Vetting the doctor.
Dimond B
Mod Midwife; 1994 Sep; 4(9):21-2. PubMed ID: 7953813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. One-to-one midwifery. Women's responses.
McCourt C
Mod Midwife; 1996 Oct; 6(10):8-11. PubMed ID: 9052138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Birth rights. Interview by Zoe Morris.
Dorey-Irani A; McCrae A
Nurs Stand; 2002 Oct 30-Nov 5; 17(7):17-8. PubMed ID: 12452081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Saying 'goodbye' to single-handed practices; what do patients and staff lose or gain?
van den Hombergh P; Engels Y; van den Hoogen H; van Doremalen J; van den Bosch W; Grol R
Fam Pract; 2005 Feb; 22(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 15640293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Delivering satisfaction.
Cresswell J
Nurs Times; 1997 May 7-13; 93(19):22-5. PubMed ID: 9188430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of Midwifery Group Practice. Part II: women's satisfaction.
Fereday J; Collins C; Turnbull D; Pincombe J; Oster C
Women Birth; 2009 Mar; 22(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 18926788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Collaborative practice. Characteristics, barriers, benefits, and implications for midwifery.
Keleher KC
J Nurse Midwifery; 1998; 43(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 9489285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What big practices can learn from small ones.
Terry K
Med Econ; 1993 Dec; 70(24):55-6, 58-9. PubMed ID: 10130641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Make your small practice thrive. Physicians moving from big practices to small must know the business side of medicine.
Cowan D
Physician Exec; 2001; 27(5):66-70. PubMed ID: 12881908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Becoming independent.
Perridge T
Pract Midwife; 1999; 2(7):53. PubMed ID: 10481694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Certified nurse midwives: a cost-effective alternative to physician staffing.
Holman GE
Coll Rev; 1992; 9(2):69-81. PubMed ID: 10121947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nurses as implementers of organizational culture.
Wooten LP; Crane P
Nurs Econ; 2003; 21(6):275-9, 259. PubMed ID: 14705557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
