308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8706470)
1. Can healthcare providers obtain judicial intervention against surrogates who demand "medically inappropriate" life support for incompetent patients?
Cantor NL
Crit Care Med; 1996 May; 24(5):883-7. PubMed ID: 8706470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Helga Wanglie revisited: medical futility and the limits of autonomy.
Johnson DH
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 8293205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment decisions for patients without surrogates: rethinking policies for a vulnerable population.
Miller TE; Coleman CH; Cugliari AM
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Mar; 45(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 9063286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical futility: a futile concept?
Shiner K
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1996; 53(2):803-48. PubMed ID: 11656798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The permanently unconscious patient, non-feeding and euthanasia.
Cantor NL
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):381-437. PubMed ID: 2517381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of courts in terminating nutrition and hydration for incompetent patients.
Wintersheimer DC
Issues Law Med; 1995; 10(4):453-65. PubMed ID: 7737850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Substituted judgment, best interests, and the need for best respect.
Martyn SR
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(2):195-208. PubMed ID: 8049767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Terri Schiavo, Son Hudson, and 'nonbeneficial' medical treatments.
Veatch RM
Health Aff (Millwood); 2005; 24(4):976-9. PubMed ID: 16012138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Collective decisions about medical futility.
Spielman B
J Law Med Ethics; 1994; 22(2):152-60, discussion 161-2. PubMed ID: 7921083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In re Donald McCarthy.
Harburg M
Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 7960666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The legal consensus about foregoing life-sustaining treatment: its status and its prospects.
Meisel A
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1992 Dec; 2(4):309-45. PubMed ID: 10123320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent.
Annas GJ
Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In re guardianship of Doe.
Avila D
Issues Law Med; 1993; 8(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 8463078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Decision making in the care of terminally ill incompetent persons: concerns about the role of the courts.
Mariner WK
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1984 Oct; 32(10):739-46. PubMed ID: 6481053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Looking for traction on the slippery slope: a discussion of the Michael Martin Case.
Hess JH
Issues Law Med; 1995; 11(2):105-22. PubMed ID: 7591660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The best interests standard: a comparison of the state's parens patriae authority and judicial oversight in best interests determinations for children and incompetent patients.
Griffith DB
Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(3):283-338. PubMed ID: 1765451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminal ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part I.
Suber DG; Tabor WJ
JAMA; 1982 Nov; 248(18):2250-1. PubMed ID: 7131676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In re Guardianship of Schiavo.
Florida, District Court of Appeal, Second District
Wests South Report; 2003; 851():182-7. PubMed ID: 15179948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In re Edna MF: case law confusion in surrogate decision making.
Shapiro RS
Theor Med Bioeth; 1999 Jan; 20(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 10442053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
Bopp J; Coleson RE
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
