These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8707495)

  • 1. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials. Current issues and future directions.
    Moher D; Jadad AR; Tugwell P
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1996; 12(2):195-208. PubMed ID: 8707495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists.
    Moher D; Jadad AR; Nichol G; Penman M; Tugwell P; Walsh S
    Control Clin Trials; 1995 Feb; 16(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 7743790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: a systematic review.
    Strech D; Soltmann B; Weikert B; Bauer M; Pfennig A
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2011 Sep; 72(9):1214-21. PubMed ID: 21294992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new risk of bias checklist applicable to randomized trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews was developed and validated to be used for systematic reviews focusing on drug adverse events.
    Faillie JL; Ferrer P; Gouverneur A; Driot D; Berkemeyer S; Vidal X; Martínez-Zapata MJ; Huerta C; Castells X; Rottenkolber M; Schmiedl S; Sabaté M; Ballarín E; Ibáñez L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():168-175. PubMed ID: 28487158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methodological quality of randomized controlled trials of postoperative epidural analgesia: validation of the Epidural Analgesia Trial Checklist as a specific instrument to evaluate methodology.
    Liu SS; Togioka BM; Hurley RW; Vu CM; Hanna MN; Murphy JD; Wu CL
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2010; 35(6):549-55. PubMed ID: 20975473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality of reporting of modern randomized controlled trials in medical oncology: a systematic review.
    Péron J; Pond GR; Gan HK; Chen EX; Almufti R; Maillet D; You B
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Jul; 104(13):982-9. PubMed ID: 22761273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reporting randomized, controlled trials: where quality of reporting may be improved.
    Ko CY; Sack J; Chang JT; Fink A
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2002 Apr; 45(4):443-7. PubMed ID: 12006922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
    Groenvold M
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodologic Quality and Statistical Reporting of Physical Therapy Randomized Controlled Trials Relevant to Musculoskeletal Conditions.
    Gonzalez GZ; Moseley AM; Maher CG; Nascimento DP; Costa LDCM; Costa LO
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Jan; 99(1):129-136. PubMed ID: 28962828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The importance of preservation of the ethical principle of equipoise in the design of clinical trials: relative impact of the methodological quality domains on the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials.
    Djulbegovic B; Cantor A; Clarke M
    Account Res; 2003; 10(4):301-15. PubMed ID: 14989285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are current standards of reporting quality for clinical trials sufficient in addressing important sources of bias?
    Mills EJ; Ayers D; Chou R; Thorlund K
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):2-7. PubMed ID: 26232560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of methodologic quality of randomized trials of interventional techniques: development of an interventional pain management specific instrument.
    Manchikanti L; Hirsch JA; Cohen SP; Heavner JE; Falco FJ; Diwan S; Boswell MV; Candido KD; Onyewu CO; Zhu J; Sehgal N; Kaye AD; Benyamin RM; Helm S; Singh V; Datta S; Abdi S; Christo PJ; Hameed H; Hameed M; Vallejo R; Pampati V; Racz GB; Raj PP
    Pain Physician; 2014; 17(3):E263-90. PubMed ID: 24850111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.
    Hofstede SN; Nouta KA; Jacobs W; van Hooff ML; Wymenga AB; Pijls BG; Nelissen RG; Marang-van de Mheen PJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Feb; 2015(2):CD003130. PubMed ID: 25650566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing "best evidence": issues in grading the quality of studies for systematic reviews.
    Lohr KN; Carey TS
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1999 Sep; 25(9):470-9. PubMed ID: 10481816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 2: Randomized controlled trials.
    Manchikanti L; Hirsch JA; Smith HS
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(6):717-73. PubMed ID: 19057624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between quality of reports of antidepressant randomized controlled trials and treatment estimates: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis.
    Cipriani A; Malvini L; Furukawa TA; Barbui C
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2007 Aug; 27(4):352-6. PubMed ID: 17632218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
    Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
    Moher D; Pham B; Jones A; Cook DJ; Jadad AR; Moher M; Tugwell P; Klassen TP
    Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9128):609-13. PubMed ID: 9746022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.