These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Surrogate decision making for mentally incapacitated adults. Nelson LJ; Golenski JD Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Feb-Mar-Apr; 1(2 3 & 4):1-28. PubMed ID: 11650108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In re Smerdon. Kraayeveld J Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(3):359-61. PubMed ID: 1765455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. American Thoracic Society Ann Intern Med; 1991 Sep; 115(6):478-85. PubMed ID: 11642893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Response to special section: ethical decision making and persons with mental retardation (CQ vol. 3, no. 2). Beltran JE Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1995; 4(1):100-2. PubMed ID: 7627359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethics consultants and surrogates: can we do better? Fletcher JC J Clin Ethics; 1997; 8(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 9130109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stopping treatment on grounds of futility: a role for institutional policy. Stell LK St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):481-97. PubMed ID: 11652704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reflections on the offspring's ethical role in decisions for incompetent patients: a response to Sonnenblick, Friedlander, and Steinberg. Thomasma DC J Am Geriatr Soc; 1993 Jun; 41(6):684-6. PubMed ID: 8505469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Proxy decision making for incompetent patients. An ethical and empirical analysis. Emanuel EJ; Emanuel LL JAMA; 1992 Apr; 267(15):2067-71. PubMed ID: 1552642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical surrogacy mediation: expanding patient, family, and physician rights and reformulating the Virginia Health Care Decisions Act. Moore DJ Va J Soc Policy Law; 2003; 10(3):410-44. PubMed ID: 15744904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The benefits of a North Carolina policy for determining inappropriate or futile medical care. Kopelman AE; Parker JC; Ho G; Willson CF; Kopelman LM N C Med J; 2005; 66(5):392-4. PubMed ID: 16323592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Who decides who decides? When disagreement occurs between the physician and the patient's appointed proxy about the patient's decision-making capacity. Schneiderman LJ; Teetzel H Arch Intern Med; 1995 Apr; 155(8):793-6. PubMed ID: 7717786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term care facility policies on life-sustaining treatments and advance directives in Canada. Choudhry NK; Ma J; Rasooly I; Singer PA J Am Geriatr Soc; 1994 Nov; 42(11):1150-3. PubMed ID: 7963200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment decisions for patients without surrogates: rethinking policies for a vulnerable population. Miller TE; Coleman CH; Cugliari AM J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Mar; 45(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 9063286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. When others must choose: deciding for patients without capacity. The New York State Task Force on Life and the Law. Daly RW HEC Forum; 1993 Mar; 5(2):100-7. PubMed ID: 10125155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent for research on human subjects with dementia. AGS Ethics Committee. American Geriatrics Society. J Am Geriatr Soc; 1998 Oct; 46(10):1308-10. PubMed ID: 9777917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]