207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8708805)
1. Current assessment of the use of intrauterine devices.
Westhoff CL
J Nurse Midwifery; 1996; 41(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 8708805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Was the Dalkon Shield a safe and effective intrauterine device? The conflict between case-control and clinical trial study findings.
Mumford SD; Kessel E
Fertil Steril; 1992 Jun; 57(6):1151-76. PubMed ID: 1601137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Current status of intrauterine devices. II. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease and ectopic pregnancy.
Malhotra N; Chaudhury RR
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1982 Jan; 37(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 7054735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Milestones in intrauterine device development.
Tatum HJ
Fertil Steril; 1983 Feb; 39(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 6401633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Another look at the Dalkon Shield: meta-analysis underscores its problems.
Sivin I
Contraception; 1993 Jul; 48(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 8403900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. IUDs, inflammation, and infection: assessment after two decades of IUD use.
Schmidt WA
Hum Pathol; 1982 Oct; 13(10):878-81. PubMed ID: 6751984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. IUDs: current perspectives.
Hepburn S
Curr Ther (Seaforth); 1994 Oct; 35(10):49-55. PubMed ID: 12319352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. IUDs struggle to shake off legacy of past.
Barron T
Family Plan World; 1992; 2(1):10-1, 31. PubMed ID: 12317120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Today's IUDs offer safe, effective contraception.
Finger WR
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1993 Mar; 13(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 12318094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acceptability of IUDs is increasing.
Finger WR; Barr D
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1992 Oct; 13(2):27-30. PubMed ID: 12286082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].
Forrest JD
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postpartum IUDS: keys for success.
O'Hanley K; Huber DH
Contraception; 1992 Apr; 45(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 1516367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modern intra-uterine devices.
Odlind V
Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Apr; 10(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 8736722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective randomized comparative trial of the Gravigard, Latex Leaf, Dalkon Shield and Multiload Cu 250 IUDs.
McCarthy TG; Chew SC; Lim SM; Cheng MC; Ratnam SS
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Aug; 26(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 3545173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fertility after contraception or abortion.
Huggins GR; Cullins VE
Fertil Steril; 1990 Oct; 54(4):559-73. PubMed ID: 2209874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term study of the safety of the Dalkon Shield and Gyne-T 200 intrauterine devices.
Rioux JE; Cloutier D; Dupont P; Lamonde D
CMAJ; 1986 Apr; 134(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 3948091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The IUD: dispelling the myths and assessing the potential.
Mishell Dr ; Sulak PJ
Dialogues Contracept; 1997; 5(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 12292543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The intrauterine device, pelvic inflammatory disease, and infertility: the confusion between hypothesis and knowledge.
Grimes DA
Fertil Steril; 1992 Oct; 58(4):670-3. PubMed ID: 1426307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Epidemiology of pelvic inflammatory disease in parous women with special reference to intrauterine device use.
Buchan H; Villard-Mackintosh L; Vessey M; Yeates D; McPherson K
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Sep; 97(9):780-8. PubMed ID: 2242362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
