These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8709873)

  • 1. Error rates in Australian chemical pathology laboratories.
    Khoury M; Burnett L; Mackay MA
    Med J Aust; 1996 Aug; 165(3):128-30. PubMed ID: 8709873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Amended reports in surgical pathology and implications for diagnostic error detection and avoidance: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 1,667,547 accessioned cases in 359 laboratories.
    Nakhleh RE; Zarbo RJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 9648896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing errors in identification of von Willebrand disease: the experience of the royal college of pathologists of australasia quality assurance program.
    Favaloro EJ; Bonar R; Kershaw G; Sioufi J; Baker R; Hertzberg M; Street A; Marsden K
    Semin Thromb Hemost; 2006 Jul; 32(5):505-13. PubMed ID: 16862524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification errors in pathology and laboratory medicine.
    Valenstein PN; Sirota RL
    Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):979-96, vii. PubMed ID: 15555752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification of errors in laboratory reports. A quality improvement study of the College of American Pathologists' Q-Probes program.
    Howanitz PJ; Walker K; Bachner P
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Jul; 116(7):694-700. PubMed ID: 1497440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Six Sigma approach to the rate and clinical effect of registration errors in a laboratory.
    Vanker N; van Wyk J; Zemlin AE; Erasmus RT
    J Clin Pathol; 2010 May; 63(5):434-7. PubMed ID: 20299386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interinstitutional comparison of bedside blood glucose monitoring program characteristics, accuracy performance, and quality control documentation: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of bedside blood glucose monitoring performed in 226 small hospitals.
    Novis DA; Jones BA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):495-502. PubMed ID: 9625416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory errors as judged by test request slips and test reports.
    Siddiqui S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2006 Feb; 16(2):136-8. PubMed ID: 16499809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extraneous tissue in surgical pathology: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 275 laboratories.
    Gephardt GN; Zarbo RJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Nov; 120(11):1009-14. PubMed ID: 12049100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiprogram characterization of laboratory bias, precision, and total error. Proposal for improved assessment with shared external and expanded internal (regional) quality control pools.
    Lawson NS; Gilmore BF; Tholen DW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 3355348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detecting and preventing the occurrence of errors in the practices of laboratory medicine and anatomic pathology: 15 years' experience with the College of American Pathologists' Q-PROBES and Q-TRACKS programs.
    Novis DA
    Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):965-78. PubMed ID: 15555751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Database construction for improving patient safety by examining pathology errors.
    Grzybicki DM; Turcsanyi B; Becich MJ; Gupta D; Gilbertson JR; Raab SS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Oct; 124(4):500-9. PubMed ID: 16146808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laboratory error undetectable by customary quality control/quality assurance monitors.
    Kazmierczak SC; Catrou PG
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Jul; 117(7):714-8. PubMed ID: 8323436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the impact of a CD4+ T-cell testing laboratory improvement program.
    Rosner E; Siragusa M; Schalla W; Cross D; Cohn R; Hearn T
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 9625418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Internal quality control, proficiency testing, and the clinical relevance of laboratory testing.
    Kafka MT
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 3355347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine.
    Plebani M
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2010 Mar; 47(Pt 2):101-10. PubMed ID: 19952034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring the iceberg of errors in laboratory medicine.
    Plebani M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jun; 404(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 19302995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An audit on the reporting of critical results in a tertiary institute.
    Rensburg MA; Nutt L; Zemlin AE; Erasmus RT
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2009 Mar; 46(Pt 2):162-4. PubMed ID: 19225027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. European Good Laboratory and Clinical Practices: their relevance to clinical pathology laboratories.
    Dent NJ
    Qual Assur; 1991 Oct; 1(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 1669972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving patient safety by examining pathology errors.
    Raab SS
    Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):849-63. PubMed ID: 15555746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.