These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Professional indemnity and other medico-legal matters: a midwifery concern? Mair J Aust Coll Midwives Inc J; 1995 Jun; 8(2):9-13. PubMed ID: 7575191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Midwifery and malpractice. Perkins BB Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2006; (79):22-3. PubMed ID: 17024893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Failure to inform of AFP test: birth defects--$4.3 million damages. Case in point: Basten by and through Basten v. U.S. 848 F. Supp. 2d 962 AL (1994). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jul; 35(2):2. PubMed ID: 7520591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Did certified nurse midwife apply too much lateral traction? Case on Point: Hankla v. Jackson, A10A0077 (7/14/2010)-GA. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Oct; 51(5):2. PubMed ID: 21140829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The review of the 1979 Nurses, Midwives and Health Visitors Act. Chaffer D Nurs Times; 1998 Feb 18-24; 94(7):45. PubMed ID: 9536733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Charting: your legal record. Green J Birth Gaz; 1996; 12(3):20-1. PubMed ID: 9015967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Regulation of Prescriptive Authority for Certified Nurse-Midwives and Certified Midwives: 2015 National Overview. Osborne K J Midwifery Womens Health; 2015; 60(5):519-33. PubMed ID: 26461190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Midwifery negligence: a case study. Mair JL Aust Coll Midwives Inc J; 1997 Dec; 10(4):27-30. PubMed ID: 9555373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. United States Model Midwifery Legislation and Regulation: Development of a Consensus Document. Kennedy HP; Myers-Ciecko JA; Carr KC; Breedlove G; Bailey T; Farrell MV; Lawlor M; Darragh I J Midwifery Womens Health; 2018 Nov; 63(6):652-659. PubMed ID: 29461681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Midwives act. Important changes secured by the OIIQ. Desrosiers G Infirm Que; 1999; 6(6):4-7. PubMed ID: 10786498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. An exploration of the effects of clinical negligence litigation on the practice of midwives in England: A phenomenological study. Robertson JH; Thomson AM Midwifery; 2016 Feb; 33():55-63. PubMed ID: 26527326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The midwifery debate: should non-nurses be allowed to practice midwifery? Carty E; Tait J RNABC News; 1987; 19(5):15-7. PubMed ID: 3685819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Think ahead to minimise risks of midwifery care. Williams J Nurs Times; 1997 May 14-20; 93(20):58-60. PubMed ID: 9197760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Interview with: Donna Vidam, CPM. Interview by Ina May Gaskin. Vidam D Birth Gaz; 1996; 12(2):10-3. PubMed ID: 9015954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Midwives must determine midwifery matters. Roch S Mod Midwife; 1995 Oct; 5(10):7. PubMed ID: 7583412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]