These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8711123)

  • 1. Lap pad left in patient: is nurse or doctor responsible? Case in point: Ravi v. Coates 662 So. 2d 218-AL (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Jan; 36(8):2. PubMed ID: 8711123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Failure to chart that Dr. was notified of pt.'s deterioration. Case in point: Sweeney v. Purvis 665 So. 2d 926--AL (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Mar; 36(10):2. PubMed ID: 8711110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgeon attempts to blame nurses for sponge left in mastectomy patient. Case on point: Mitchell v. Baylor Univ. Med. Ctr., 2003 WL 21508493 S.W.3d-TX.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Aug; 44(3):2. PubMed ID: 14508919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nurse and the law. More on foreign bodies.
    Langslow A
    Aust Nurses J; 1992 Jul; 22(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 1530525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can doctors rely on nurses' sponge counts? Case in point: Van Hook v. Anderson (824 P. 2d 509--WA (1992)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Apr; 32(11):2. PubMed ID: 1603936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gauze pad left in pt. during reversal of tubal ligation surgery. Case on point: Houserman v. Garrett, 2004 WL 2829112.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Dec; 45(7):4. PubMed ID: 15675762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The surgeon and the nurse share the blame: a case of a retained sponge.
    Rozovsky LE; Rozovsky FA
    Can Oper Room Nurs J; 1991; 9(3):20-1. PubMed ID: 1933679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nurse and the law. Relying on the count.
    Langslow A
    Aust Nurses J; 1992 Jun; 21(11):31-2. PubMed ID: 1530515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Legal case briefs for nurses. IA: unattended pt. falls in bathroom: "routine nonmedicale care" standard applied; OR: nurses state "all sponges ... removed": court rejects "captain of ship" doctrine.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Nov; 34(6):3. PubMed ID: 8265796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. RN removed FHR monitor to make room: $3.8 million verdict. CASE ON POINT: Long v. Wader, 2007 ALSC 1041887--08/31/07) So.2d-AL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2008 Jan; 48(8):2. PubMed ID: 18330376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Legal case briefs for nurses. AL.: nursing protocols excluded in death case: reversible error issue; AL.: E.R. nurse toe tags wrong bodies: can nurse rely on police identification?
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Mar; 32(10):3. PubMed ID: 1594771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can suit succeed after expiration of limitations? Case on point: Walters v. Cleveland Regional Medical Center, 08-0169 (3/12/2010) S.W.3d-TX.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Mar; 50(10):2. PubMed ID: 20499619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is there a nurse-patient privilege? Case in point: Roberson by Isaac v. Liu (555 N.E. 2d 999--IL (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Sep; 31(4):2. PubMed ID: 2217817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sponge left in pt. - Dr. settled: hospital sued for OR nurses' negligence. Savage v. Three Rivers Medical Center, C-000348-DG KYSC---S.W.3d---(10/25/2012)-KY.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2012 Dec; 53(7):1. PubMed ID: 23383465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nurse fails to chart call to doctor. Case in point: Morse v. Flint River Comm. Hosp. 450 S.E.2d 253--GA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Jan; 35(8):2. PubMed ID: 7886195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgeon not liable for CRNA: no "borrowed servant". Case in point: Harris V. Miller 438 S. E. 2d 731 NC (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Mar; 34(10):2. PubMed ID: 8184088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Punitive damage award of $5 million reduced. Mobile Infirmary Assn. v. Tyler, 2007 ALSC 1041484 (09/14/07) So.2d -AL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2008 Jan; 48(8):1. PubMed ID: 18330375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nurses failed to 'advocate' for their patient. Case on point: Rowe v. Sisters of Pallottine Missionary Society, 2001 WL 1585453 s.e.2d -WV.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Jan; 42(8):2. PubMed ID: 15301071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mystery nurse reports child's sexually transmitted disease in error. Case in point: Perez v. Bay Area Hospital (829 P. Rptr. 2d 700--OR [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Jul; 33(2):4. PubMed ID: 1509091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nurse fails to follow "doctor's policy": death results. Case in point: Hartman v. Riverside Methodist Hosp. (577 N.E.2d 112--OH (1989)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):2. PubMed ID: 1722340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.