247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8711476)
1. How congressional pressure shaped the 'Baltimore case'.
Friedly J
Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5277):873-5. PubMed ID: 8711476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Clearing of researcher in 'Baltimore affair' boosts demand for reforms.
Steele F
Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):719-20. PubMed ID: 8657264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Imanishi-Kari ruling slams ORI.
Kaiser J; Marshall E
Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5270):1864-5. PubMed ID: 8658151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.
Pascal CB
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 11657856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A costly settlement ends whistle-blower suit.
Taubes G
Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):605. PubMed ID: 8303265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The assault on David Baltimore.
Kevles DJ
New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
Kline S
J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Misconduct finding in the Gallo case.
Greenberg D
Lancet; 1993 Jan; 341(8838):166-7. PubMed ID: 8093759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Baltimore defeat a defeat for research.
Nature; 1991 Dec; 354(6353):419-20. PubMed ID: 1660961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The 'Gallo case': Popovic strikes back.
Kaiser J
Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5302):920-1. PubMed ID: 9053992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific misconduct in US health service.
Choo V
Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8961):1359. PubMed ID: 11644692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Legal protections for the scientific misconduct whistleblower.
Poon P
J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 7627310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Federal inquiry finds misconduct by a discoverer of the AIDS virus.
Hilts P
N Y Times Web; 1992 Dec; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Resounding echoes of Gallo case.
Greenberg DS
Lancet; 1995 Mar; 345(8950):639. PubMed ID: 7898185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Margot O'Toole's record of events.
O'Toole M
Nature; 1991 May; 351(6323):180-3. PubMed ID: 1645847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A judgement fit for prime time.
Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):717. PubMed ID: 8657262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Science police.
Dolnick E
Discover; 1994 Feb; 15(2):56-63. PubMed ID: 11653089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
Lang S
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific misconduct. ORI report tracks gun-shy feds.
Kaiser J
Science; 1999 May; 284(5416):901. PubMed ID: 10357668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
