These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8711476)

  • 1. How congressional pressure shaped the 'Baltimore case'.
    Friedly J
    Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5277):873-5. PubMed ID: 8711476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clearing of researcher in 'Baltimore affair' boosts demand for reforms.
    Steele F
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):719-20. PubMed ID: 8657264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imanishi-Kari ruling slams ORI.
    Kaiser J; Marshall E
    Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5270):1864-5. PubMed ID: 8658151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.
    Pascal CB
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 11657856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A costly settlement ends whistle-blower suit.
    Taubes G
    Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):605. PubMed ID: 8303265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The assault on David Baltimore.
    Kevles DJ
    New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
    Kline S
    J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Misconduct finding in the Gallo case.
    Greenberg D
    Lancet; 1993 Jan; 341(8838):166-7. PubMed ID: 8093759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Baltimore defeat a defeat for research.
    Nature; 1991 Dec; 354(6353):419-20. PubMed ID: 1660961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The 'Gallo case': Popovic strikes back.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5302):920-1. PubMed ID: 9053992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scientific misconduct in US health service.
    Choo V
    Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8961):1359. PubMed ID: 11644692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Legal protections for the scientific misconduct whistleblower.
    Poon P
    J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 7627310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Federal inquiry finds misconduct by a discoverer of the AIDS virus.
    Hilts P
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Dec; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resounding echoes of Gallo case.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1995 Mar; 345(8950):639. PubMed ID: 7898185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Margot O'Toole's record of events.
    O'Toole M
    Nature; 1991 May; 351(6323):180-3. PubMed ID: 1645847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A judgement fit for prime time.
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):717. PubMed ID: 8657262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Science police.
    Dolnick E
    Discover; 1994 Feb; 15(2):56-63. PubMed ID: 11653089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
    Lang S
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientific misconduct. ORI report tracks gun-shy feds.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1999 May; 284(5416):901. PubMed ID: 10357668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.