These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8712131)

  • 1. Compression of digital coronary angiograms does not affect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity.
    Rigolin VH; Robiolio PA; Spero LA; Harrawood BP; Morris KG; Fortin DF; Baker WA; Bashore TM; Cusma JT
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Jul; 78(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 8712131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiolgoy International Study of Angiographic Data Compression Phase II: the effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary angiography. Joint Photographic Experts Group.
    Tuinenburg JC; Koning G; Hekking E; Zwinderman AH; Becker T; Simon R; Reiber JH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Apr; 35(5):1380-7. PubMed ID: 10758988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lossy (15:1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features.
    Baker WA; Hearne SE; Spero LA; Morris KG; Harrington RA; Sketch MH; Behar VS; Kong Y; Peter RH; Bashore TM; Harrison JK; Cusma JT
    Circulation; 1997 Aug; 96(4):1157-64. PubMed ID: 9286944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase II. The effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary angiography.
    Tuinenburg JC; Koning G; Hekking E; Zwinderman AH; Becker T; Simon R; Reiber JH
    Eur Heart J; 2000 Apr; 21(8):679-86. PubMed ID: 10731406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology International Study of Angiographic Data Compression Phase I: The effect of lossy data compression on recognition of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography.
    Kerensky RA; Cusma JT; Kubilis P; Simon R; Bashore TM; Hirshfeld JW; Holmes DR; Pepine CJ; Nissen SE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Apr; 35(5):1370-9. PubMed ID: 10758987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase I. The effects of lossy data compression on recognition of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography.
    Kerensky RA; Cusma JT; Kubilis P; Simon R; Bashore TM; Hirshfeld JW; Holmes DR; Pepine CJ; Nissen SE
    Eur Heart J; 2000 Apr; 21(8):668-78. PubMed ID: 10731405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of lossy data compression on quantitative coronary measurements.
    Koning G; Béretta P; Zwart P; Hekking E; Reiber JH
    Int J Card Imaging; 1997 Aug; 13(4):261-70. PubMed ID: 9306140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of various compression rates on interpretation of digital coronary angiograms.
    Silber S; Dörr R; Zindler G; Mühling H; Diebel T
    Int J Cardiol; 1997 Jul; 60(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 9226291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of acquisition angle differences on three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
    Tu S; Holm NR; Koning G; Maeng M; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Aug; 78(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 21766427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrepancy in the assessment of jailed side branch lesions by visual estimation and quantitative coronary angiographic analysis: comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Shin DH; Koo BK; Waseda K; Park KW; Kim HS; Corral M; Lansky A; Honda Y; Fearon WF; Fitzgerald PJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Nov; 78(5):720-6. PubMed ID: 22025472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of image compression viability for lossy and lossless JPEG and Wavelet data reduction in coronary angiography.
    Brennecke R; Bürgel U; Rippin G; Post F; Rupprecht HJ; Meyer J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2001 Feb; 17(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 11495503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variation in measurement of coronary lesions on 35 and 70 mm angiograms.
    Myers MG; Shulman HS; Saibil EA; Naqvi SZ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 May; 130(5):913-15. PubMed ID: 417590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the effect of varying MPEG-2 compression ratios on digital coronary angiographic assessment of stenosis severity.
    Okura Y; Matsumura Y; Hidaka K; Yokoyama H; Inada H; Harauchi H; Kou H; Inamura K
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Dec; 15(4):210-5. PubMed ID: 12415462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of the quantitative angiographic measurements in the New Approaches to Coronary Intervention (NACI) registry: a comparison of clinical site and repeated angiographic core laboratory readings.
    Popma JJ; Lansky AJ; Yeh W; Kennard ED; Keller MB; Merritt AJ; DeFalco RA; Desai A; Pacera JH; Schnabel JF; Niedermeyer V; Baim DS; Detre KM
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(10A):19K-25K. PubMed ID: 9409689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Physician Visual Assessment With Quantitative Coronary Angiography in Assessment of Stenosis Severity in China.
    Zhang H; Mu L; Hu S; Nallamothu BK; Lansky AJ; Xu B; Bouras G; Cohen DJ; Spertus JA; Masoudi FA; Curtis JP; Gao R; Ge J; Yang Y; Li J; Li X; Zheng X; Li Y; Krumholz HM; Jiang L;
    JAMA Intern Med; 2018 Feb; 178(2):239-247. PubMed ID: 29340571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of QCA systems.
    Dietz U; Rupprecht HJ; Brennecke R; Fritsch HP; Woltmann J; Blankenberg S; Meyer J
    Int J Card Imaging; 1997 Aug; 13(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 9306141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology International Study of Angiographic Data Compression Phase III: measurement of image quality differences at varying levels of data compression.
    Brennecke R; Bürgel U; Simon R; Rippin G; Fritsch HP; Becker T; Nissen SE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Apr; 35(5):1388-97. PubMed ID: 10758989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual estimation versus different quantitative coronary angiography methods to assess lesion severity in bifurcation lesions.
    Grundeken MJ; Collet C; Ishibashi Y; Généreux P; Muramatsu T; LaSalle L; Kaplan AV; Wykrzykowska JJ; Morel MA; Tijssen JG; de Winter RJ; Onuma Y; Leon MB; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 91(7):1263-1270. PubMed ID: 28836339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of automated quantitative coronary angiography with caliper measurements of percent diameter stenosis.
    Kalbfleisch SJ; McGillem MJ; Pinto IM; Kavanaugh KM; DeBoe SF; Mancini GB
    Am J Cardiol; 1990 May; 65(18):1181-4. PubMed ID: 2337026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography: observer-, short-, and medium-term variabilities.
    Reiber JH; van der Zwet PM; Koning G; von Land CD; van Meurs B; Gerbrands JJ; Buis B; van Voorthuisen AE
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Mar; 28(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 8439993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.