These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8713616)

  • 21. Assessment of the apical transportation of root canals using the method of the curvature radius.
    Lopes HP; Elias CN; Estrela C; Siqueira JF
    Braz Dent J; 1998; 9(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 9835803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparative study on the effect of three methods of instrumentation on the shape of root canal (an in-vitro study).
    Kataia MA; el-Sayed JM; Ezzat KM; Seif RE
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Apr; 41(2):1105-12. PubMed ID: 9497646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 16507073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Identifying multiplanar root canal curvatures using stainless-steel instruments.
    Jerome CE; Hanlon RJ
    J Endod; 2003 May; 29(5):356-8. PubMed ID: 12775011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Shaping root canals, Part VI: GT File technique in abruptly curved canals.
    Buchanan LS
    Dent Today; 2000 Feb; 19(2):66-71, 166. PubMed ID: 15027289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
    Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
    Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Shaping ability of Mity Roto 360 degrees and Naviflex rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2.
    Thompson SA; Dummer PM
    J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 9641148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK
    Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An in vitro evaluation of performance of two electronic root canal length measurement devices during retreatment of different obturating materials.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Kabi D
    J Endod; 2010 Sep; 36(9):1526-30. PubMed ID: 20728721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals.
    Ayar LR; Love RM
    Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):593-601. PubMed ID: 15317562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative evaluation of the preparation efficacies of HERO Shaper and Nitiflex root canal instruments in curved root canals.
    Kaptan F; Sert S; Kayahan B; Haznedaroğlu F; Tanalp J; Bayirli G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 16243253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of two root canal length measurement devices integrated into rotary endodontic motors when removing gutta-percha from root-filled teeth.
    Uzun O; Topuz O; Tinaz C; Nekoofar MH; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2008 Sep; 41(9):725-32. PubMed ID: 18637852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
    Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
    J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The challenge of preparing the curved root canal.
    Saunders EM; Saunders WP
    Dent Update; 1997; 24(6):241-4, 246-7. PubMed ID: 9515336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of root canal shape on the sealing ability of two root canal sealers.
    Juhász A; Verdes E; Tokés L; Kóbor A; Dobó-Nagy C
    Int Endod J; 2006 Apr; 39(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 16584490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Endodontic anatomy of the root canals of lower incisors.
    Artal N; Gani O
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2000; 13(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 11885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of curved canal transportation with balanced force versus lightspeed.
    Shadid DB; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
    J Endod; 1998 Oct; 24(10):651-4. PubMed ID: 10023246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The 'balanced force' concept for instrumentation of curved canals revisited.
    Charles TJ; Charles JE
    Int Endod J; 1998 May; 31(3):166-72. PubMed ID: 10321162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.