These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8713930)

  • 1. The Topcon SP 1000 and Image-NET systems. A comparison of four methods for evaluating corneal endothelial cell density.
    Vecchi M; Braccio L; Orsoni JG
    Cornea; 1996 May; 15(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 8713930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endothelial cells analysis with the TOPCON specular microscope SP-2000P and IMAGEnet system.
    Cheung SW; Cho P
    Curr Eye Res; 2000 Oct; 21(4):788-98. PubMed ID: 11120569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphometric analysis of the corneal endothelium with three different specular microscopes.
    Landesz M; Kamps A; Slart R; Siertsema JV; van Rij G
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1995; 90(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 8549239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Corneal endothelium evaluation with 2 noncontact specular microscopes and their semiautomated methods of analysis.
    de Sanctis U; Machetta F; Razzano L; Dalmasso P; Grignolo FM
    Cornea; 2006 Jun; 25(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 16783136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement area and repeatability of semiautomated assessment of corneal endothelium in the Topcon specular microscope SP-2000P and IMAGEnet system.
    Ding X; Huang Q; Zheng Y; Jiang Y; Huang S; He M
    Cornea; 2012 Oct; 31(10):1111-8. PubMed ID: 22902488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity of endothelial cell analysis methods and recommendations for calibration in Topcon SP-2000P specular microscopy.
    van Schaick W; van Dooren BT; Mulder PG; Völker-Dieben HJ
    Cornea; 2005 Jul; 24(5):538-44. PubMed ID: 15968157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell measurements by two non-contact specular microscopes.
    Gasser L; Reinhard T; Böhringer D
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Jul; 15():87. PubMed ID: 26219961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endothelial cell density in donor corneas: a comparison of automatic software programs with manual counting.
    Hirneiss C; Schumann RG; Grüterich M; Welge-Luessen UC; Kampik A; Neubauer AS
    Cornea; 2007 Jan; 26(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 17198018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of the ConfoScan3 for corneal endothelial morphology analysis.
    Sheng H; Parker EJ; Bullimore MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 84(9):888-95. PubMed ID: 17873775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of semi-automated center-dot and fully automated endothelial cell analyses from specular microscopy images.
    Maruoka S; Nakakura S; Matsuo N; Yoshitomi K; Katakami C; Tabuchi H; Chikama T; Kiuchi Y
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 38(6):2495-2507. PubMed ID: 29086325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a Reliable Automated Algorithm for the Morphometric Analysis of Human Corneal Endothelium.
    Scarpa F; Ruggeri A
    Cornea; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1222-8. PubMed ID: 27310881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Further analysis of assessments of the coefficient of variation of corneal endothelial cell areas from specular microscopic images.
    Doughty MJ; Aakre BM
    Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Sep; 91(5):438-46. PubMed ID: 18537989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of possible error sources in corneal endothelial morphometry with a semiautomated noncontact specular microscope.
    Doughty MJ
    Cornea; 2013 Sep; 32(9):1196-203. PubMed ID: 23792438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo confocal microscopy of the corneal endothelium: comparison of three morphometry methods after corneal transplantation.
    Jonuscheit S; Doughty MJ; Ramaesh K
    Eye (Lond); 2011 Sep; 25(9):1130-7. PubMed ID: 21660067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Endothelial keratopathy in pseudoexfoliation syndrome: quantitative and qualitative morphometry using automated video image analysis].
    Seitz B; Müller EE; Langenbucher A; Kus MM; Naumann GO
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 Sep; 207(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 7474785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility of endothelial assessment during corneal organ culture: comparison of a computer-assisted analyzer with manual methods.
    Deb-Joardar N; Thuret G; Gavet Y; Acquart S; Garraud O; Egelhoffer H; Gain P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 May; 48(5):2062-7. PubMed ID: 17460261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of endothelial cell count using confocal and contact specular microscopy.
    Klais CM; Bühren J; Kohnen T
    Ophthalmologica; 2003; 217(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 12592045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Reproducibility and validity of a new automatic method of specular microscopy analysis of corneal endothelium].
    Seitz B; Müller EE; Langenbucher A; Kus MM; Naumann GO
    Ophthalmologe; 1997 Feb; 94(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 9156637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of applied corneal endothelium image segmentation techniques on the clinical parameters.
    Piorkowski A; Nurzynska K; Gronkowska-Serafin J; Selig B; Boldak C; Reska D
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2017 Jan; 55():13-27. PubMed ID: 27553657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell density estimated with 2 noncontact specular microscopes.
    Goldich Y; Marcovich AL; Barkana Y; Hartstein M; Morad Y; Avni I; Zadok D
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2010; 20(5):825-30. PubMed ID: 20175056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.