These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8713930)

  • 21. CorneaJ: an imageJ Plugin for semi-automated measurement of corneal endothelial cell viability.
    Bernard A; Campolmi N; He Z; Ha Thi BM; Piselli S; Forest F; Dumollard JM; Peocʼh M; Acquart S; Gain P; Thuret G
    Cornea; 2014 Jun; 33(6):604-9. PubMed ID: 24727636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative study of three semiautomated specular microscopes.
    Landesz M; Siertsema JV; Van Rij G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1995 Jul; 21(4):409-16. PubMed ID: 8523285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Inherent errors of the fixed-frame counting method for corneal endothelial cell density in eye banks.
    Campolmi N; Acquart S; He Z; Gavet Y; Jullienne R; Naigeon N; Bernard A; Forest F; Péoc'h M; Thuret G; Gain P
    Cell Tissue Bank; 2014 Sep; 15(3):451-9. PubMed ID: 24292237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Data quality of unsupervised endothelial cell counting vs. reading centre analysis in multicentric clinical trials].
    Böhringer D; Hettich L; Maier PC; Reinhard T
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Jun; 229(6):628-31. PubMed ID: 22669738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of manual & automated analysis methods for corneal endothelial cell density measurements by specular microscopy.
    Huang J; Maram J; Tepelus TC; Modak C; Marion K; Sadda SR; Chopra V; Lee OL
    J Optom; 2018; 11(3):182-191. PubMed ID: 28797649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automated determination of polygonality of corneal endothelial cells.
    Nishi O; Hanasaki K
    Cornea; 1989; 8(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 2924585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Could the coefficient of variation (COV) of the corneal endothelium be overestimated when a centre-dot method is used?
    Doughty MJ
    Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Jan; 91(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 18045256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The methods of analysis of the endothelial microscopy].
    Loukotová V; Hlinomazová Z; Horácková M; Vlková E
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2007 May; 63(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 17621834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessments of corneal endothelial cell density in growing children and its relationship to horizontal corneal diameter.
    Müller A; Doughty MJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Dec; 79(12):762-70. PubMed ID: 12512684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of automated vs manual analysis of corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in normal and corneal endothelial dystrophy-affected dogs.
    Miyagi H; Stanley AA; Chokshi TJ; Pasqualino CY; Hoehn AL; Murphy CJ; Thomasy SM
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 23(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 31179615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Automated pattern analysis of corneal endothelium.
    Rao GN; Shaw EL; Stevens RE; Aquavella JV
    Ophthalmology; 1979 Jul; 86(7):1367-73. PubMed ID: 233869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is manual counting of corneal endothelial cell density in eye banks still acceptable? The French experience.
    Thuret G; Manissolle C; Acquart S; Le Petit JC; Maugery J; Campos-Guyotat L; Doughty MJ; Gain P
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 87(12):1481-6. PubMed ID: 14660458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Corneal endothelial cell density decreases with age in emmetropic eyes.
    Sanchis-Gimeno JA; Lleó-Pérez A; Alonso L; Rahhal MS; Martínez Soriano F
    Histol Histopathol; 2005 Apr; 20(2):423-7. PubMed ID: 15736046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automated segmentation of the corneal endothelium in a large set of 'real-world' specular microscopy images using the U-Net architecture.
    Daniel MC; Atzrodt L; Bucher F; Wacker K; Böhringer S; Reinhard T; Böhringer D
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):4752. PubMed ID: 30894636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of 4 specular microscopes in healthy eyes and eyes with cornea guttata or corneal grafts.
    Luft N; Hirnschall N; Schuschitz S; Draschl P; Findl O
    Cornea; 2015 Apr; 34(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 25719252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of corneal endothelial image analysis by Konan SP8000 noncontact and Bio-Optics Bambi systems.
    Benetz BA; Diaconu E; Bowlin SJ; Oak SS; Laing RA; Lass JH
    Cornea; 1999 Jan; 18(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 9894940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of Noncontact Specular and Confocal Microscopy for Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium.
    Huang J; Maram J; Tepelus TC; Sadda SR; Chopra V; Lee OL
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Sep; 44 Suppl 1():S144-S150. PubMed ID: 28346276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automated video image morphometry of the corneal endothelium.
    Siertsema JV; Landesz M; van den Brom H; van Rij G
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1993; 85(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 8181424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of manual and automated endothelial cell density analysis in normal eyes and DSEK eyes.
    Price MO; Fairchild KM; Price FW
    Cornea; 2013 May; 32(5):567-73. PubMed ID: 22893099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measurements of central corneal thickness and endothelial parameters with three different non-contact specular microscopy devices.
    Cakici O; Karadag R; Bayramlar H; Koyun E
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 37(1):229-233. PubMed ID: 27221264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.