BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8714345)

  • 21. Localization in impaired spatial vision.
    Takayama Y; Sugishita M; Fukuyama H; Akiguchi I
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 1995 Aug; 97(3):249-52. PubMed ID: 7586858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hemisphere contributions to the composition of the pattern-evoked potential waveform.
    Blumenhardt LD; Halliday AM
    Exp Brain Res; 1979 Jun; 36(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 467535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field: effects on visual perception and attention.
    Grosbras MH; Paus T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):1109-20. PubMed ID: 12419133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Allocation of visual attention to spatial locations: tradeoff functions for event-related brain potentials and detection performance.
    Mangun GR; Hillyard SA
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jun; 47(6):532-50. PubMed ID: 2367174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The interdependence of spatial attention and lexical access as revealed by early asymmetries in occipito-parietal ERP activity.
    Dell'Acqua R; Pesciarelli F; Jolicoeur P; Eimer M; Peressotti F
    Psychophysiology; 2007 May; 44(3):436-43. PubMed ID: 17371492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The lateralization of language comprehension using event-related potentials.
    Nelson CA; Collins PF; Torres F
    Brain Cogn; 1990 Sep; 14(1):92-112. PubMed ID: 2223048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Simulating transcranial magnetic stimulation during PET with a large-scale neural network model of the prefrontal cortex and the visual system.
    Husain FT; Nandipati G; Braun AR; Cohen LG; Tagamets MA; Horwitz B
    Neuroimage; 2002 Jan; 15(1):58-73. PubMed ID: 11771974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hallucinations following occipital lobe damage: the pathological activation of visual representations.
    Anderson SW; Rizzo M
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1994 Oct; 16(5):651-63. PubMed ID: 7836488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bilateral field interactions, hemispheric specialization and evoked potential interhemispheric transmission time.
    Larson EB; Brown WS
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 May; 35(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 9153019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Orientation sensitive properties of visually driven neurons in extrastriate area 21a of cat cortex.
    Harutiunian-Kozak BA; Grigorian GG; Kozak JA; Sharanbekian AB; Sarkisyan GS; Khachvankian DK
    Arch Ital Biol; 2008 Jun; 146(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 18822799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Anisotropy in the representation of direction preferences in cat area 18.
    Ribot J; Tanaka S; O'Hashi K; Ajima A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 May; 27(10):2773-80. PubMed ID: 18489580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An ERP index of task relevance evaluation of visual stimuli.
    Potts GF
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Oct; 56(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 15380870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evidence for an independent stimulus-centered spatial reference frame from a case of visual hemineglect.
    Arguin M; Bub DN
    Cortex; 1993 Jun; 29(2):349-57. PubMed ID: 8348832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of experimental 'scotomata' on the ipsilateral and contralateral responses to pattern-reversal in one half-field.
    Blumhardt LD; Barrett G; Halliday AM; Kriss A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1978 Sep; 45(3):376-92. PubMed ID: 79476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neuroplasticity after unilateral visual cortex damage in the newborn cat.
    Rushmore RJ; Payne BR
    Behav Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 153(2):557-65. PubMed ID: 15265654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spatial property of motion visual evoked potentials.
    Takao M; Miyata Y
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Dec; 93(3):735-8. PubMed ID: 11806596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Human perceptual learning in the peripheral visual field: sensory thresholds and neurophysiological correlates.
    Ludwig I; Skrandies W
    Biol Psychol; 2002 May; 59(3):187-206. PubMed ID: 12009561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hemispheric differences for visual evoked potentials from checkerboard stimuli.
    Pike J; Polich J
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(6):947-52. PubMed ID: 3194058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attentional shifts induced by uninformative number symbols modulate neural activity in human occipital cortex.
    Goffaux V; Martin R; Dormal G; Goebel R; Schiltz C
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3419-28. PubMed ID: 23044279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Early visual cortical processing suggested by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Corthout E; Hallett M; Cowey A
    Neuroreport; 2002 Jul; 13(9):1163-6. PubMed ID: 12151761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.