These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8714388)

  • 1. [The perception of the tone and noise quality of a sound signal].
    Malinnikova TG; Chernova EI; Chistovich IA
    Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 1995 Jul; 81(7):131-40. PubMed ID: 8714388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The auditory perception of frequency-localized acoustic on-events].
    Liublinskaia VV; Stoliarova EI; Malinnikova TG
    Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 1995 Jul; 81(7):120-30. PubMed ID: 8714387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The role of amplitude modulation in forming the auditory images of speech signals].
    Liublimskaia VV; Malinnikova TG; Chernova EI
    Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 1994 Oct; 80(10):39-52. PubMed ID: 7536540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-channel amplitude sweeps are crucial to speech intelligibility.
    Prendergast G; Green GG
    Brain Lang; 2012 Mar; 120(3):406-11. PubMed ID: 22137845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The age-sex traits of the perception of the emotional characteristics of speech under noise exposure].
    Dmitrieva ES; Zaĭtseva KA; Gel'man VIa
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1999; 25(3):57-64. PubMed ID: 10822625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responsiveness of the human auditory cortex to degraded speech sounds: reduction of amplitude resolution vs. additive noise.
    Miettinen I; Alku P; Salminen N; May PJ; Tiitinen H
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():298-309. PubMed ID: 20969833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Speech coding strategy based on amplitude and frequency modulation for cochlear implants].
    Lin H; Wang W
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 28(2):228-32. PubMed ID: 21604474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech.
    Jin IK; Kates JM; Arehart KH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 23039565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.
    Nie K; Stickney G; Zeng FG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15651565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Synchrony capture filterbank: auditory-inspired signal processing for tracking individual frequency components in speech.
    Kumaresan R; Peddinti VK; Cariani P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4290-310. PubMed ID: 23742379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time and frequency metrics related to auditory masking of a 10 kHz tone in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus).
    Branstetter BK; Trickey JS; Aihara H; Finneran JJ; Liberman TR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):4556. PubMed ID: 25669265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Central auditory processing of peripheral vowel spectra.
    Chistovich LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Mar; 77(3):789-805. PubMed ID: 3980877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computational speech segregation based on an auditory-inspired modulation analysis.
    May T; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3350. PubMed ID: 25480079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Auditory localization and speech perception in noise. Preliminary study concerning 5 cases of perceptual deafness].
    Canévet G; Santon F; Scharf B
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1986; 103(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 3706968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
    Whitmal NA; Poissant SF; Freyman RL; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modified spectral tilt affects older, but not younger, infants' native-language fricative discrimination.
    Beach EF; Kitamura C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Apr; 54(2):658-67. PubMed ID: 20844257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cantonese tone recognition with enhanced temporal periodicity cues.
    Yuan M; Lee T; Yuen KC; Soli SD; van Hasselt CA; Tong MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):327-37. PubMed ID: 19603889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Content and procedural learning in repeated sentence tests of speech perception.
    Yund EW; Woods DL
    Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):769-78. PubMed ID: 20562624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.