These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8717898)

  • 1. Bloody fetus handed to mother for photo: emotional distress. Case in point: Brown v. Philadelphia College 674 A. 2d 1130--PA (1996).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Jun; 37(1):2. PubMed ID: 8717898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ER nurse leaves intact fetus in patient's clothing. Case on point: Roddy v. Tanner Medical Center, 585 S.E.2d 175-GA (2003).
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Oct; 44(5):4. PubMed ID: 14621518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Failure to timely report test results: cause of stillbirth? Case in point: Clancy v. Euclid General Hospital (584 N.E. 2d 763--OH (1989)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Mar; 32(10):2. PubMed ID: 1594770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal distress: "Failure to call for help". Case in point: Fairfax Hosp. System, Inc. v. McCarty (419 S.E.2d 621--VA [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Nov; 33(6):4. PubMed ID: 1302864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nursing negligence not "superceding" cause of death. Case in point: Dent v. Perkins 629 So. 2d 1354--LA (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Apr; 34(11):4. PubMed ID: 8184094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Asleep on duty" record impacts delay in delivery case. Case in point: St. Paul Medical Center v. Cecil (842 S.W.2d 808--TX [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Mar; 33(10):2. PubMed ID: 8493317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physicians retract opinion: nurses not negligent. Case in point: Galloway v. Baton Rouge General Hosp. (583 So. 2d 1169--LA (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):4. PubMed ID: 1763180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stillborn released to intoxicated husband: outrage suit. Case in point: Neff v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. (799 S.W. 2d 795--AR (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Feb; 31(9):4. PubMed ID: 1852894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. RN removed FHR monitor to make room: $3.8 million verdict. CASE ON POINT: Long v. Wader, 2007 ALSC 1041887--08/31/07) So.2d-AL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2008 Jan; 48(8):2. PubMed ID: 18330376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is medical chief's inquiry of nurse subject to peer review privilege? Case in point: Roach v. Springfield Clinic 623 N.E. 2d 246--IL (1992).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jan; 34(8):2. PubMed ID: 8127971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Failures to follow hospital policies result in patient's death. Case on point: Whittington v. Episcopal Hospital, 2001 WL 114942 A.2d-PA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 Mar; 41(10):4. PubMed ID: 11995191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Failure to determine breech position: M.D. or R.N. duty? Case in point: Alvis v. Henderson Obstetrics, S.C. (592 N.E.2d 678--[1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):4. PubMed ID: 1410395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nurses fail to "go over doctor's head": death results. Case in point: Strubhart v. Perry Mem. Hosp. Trus 903 P. 2d 263--OK (a995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Nov; 36(6):4. PubMed ID: 8552757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgeon not liable for CRNA: no "borrowed servant". Case in point: Harris V. Miller 438 S. E. 2d 731 NC (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Mar; 34(10):2. PubMed ID: 8184088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Implementing doctor's orders" is no defense. Case in point: Bremner v. Charles 859 P. 2d 1148--OR (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Dec; 34(7):4. PubMed ID: 8303033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nurse fails to follow "doctor's policy": death results. Case in point: Hartman v. Riverside Methodist Hosp. (577 N.E.2d 112--OH (1989)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):2. PubMed ID: 1722340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Failure to chart that Dr. was notified of pt.'s deterioration. Case in point: Sweeney v. Purvis 665 So. 2d 926--AL (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Mar; 36(10):2. PubMed ID: 8711110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does "monitor the patients" mean constantly?: $1.5 million verdict. Case in point: Adams v. Cooper Hospital 684 A. 2d 506--NJ (1996).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1997 Jan; 37(8):2. PubMed ID: 9070774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lap pad left in patient: is nurse or doctor responsible? Case in point: Ravi v. Coates 662 So. 2d 218-AL (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Jan; 36(8):2. PubMed ID: 8711123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. May you delay implementing Dr.'s orders? Case in point: Koeniguer v. Eckrich (422 N.W. 2d 600--SD (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jul; 29(2):2. PubMed ID: 3406422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.