These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8717898)

  • 21. Infliction of emotional distress.
    Hogue EE
    Pediatr Nurs; 1988; 14(6):501, 521. PubMed ID: 3211608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Failure to use fetal monitor & timely call physician. Case in point: Garcia v. Providence Medical Center (806 P. 2d 766--WA (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 May; 31(12):4. PubMed ID: 1841401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is there a nurse-patient privilege? Case in point: Roberson by Isaac v. Liu (555 N.E. 2d 999--IL (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Sep; 31(4):2. PubMed ID: 2217817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is your patient complaining of "pain" or "burning"? Case in point: McLain v. Glenwood Reg. Medical Center (601 S.E. 2d 240--LA [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Oct; 33(5):4. PubMed ID: 1454995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nurse botches catheterization causing severe urethral stricture. Case on point: Tucker v. Community Medical Center, 833 A.2d 217-PA (2003).
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Feb; 44(9):2. PubMed ID: 15038327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Who has responsibility to monitor O.R. blood loss? Case in point: Uhr v. Lutheran General Hospital (589 N.E.2d 723--IL [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):2. PubMed ID: 1410393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mystery nurse reports child's sexually transmitted disease in error. Case in point: Perez v. Bay Area Hospital (829 P. Rptr. 2d 700--OR [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Jul; 33(2):4. PubMed ID: 1509091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Allocation of fault required in 'comparative negligence' cases. Haley v. Brown, No. 93, 148 (Kan. App. 08/25/2006) P.2d -KS.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Oct; 47(5):1. PubMed ID: 17117600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nurse and the law. Negligence in bizarre cases.
    Langslow A
    Aust Nurses J; 1992 Mar; 21(8):31-2. PubMed ID: 1605784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Liability for failure to spot inconsistency in orders. Case in point: St. Germain v. Pfeifer 637 N.E.2d 848 MA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Sep; 35(4):2. PubMed ID: 7972845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Court holds "charting by exception" policy negligent. Case in point: Lama v. Borras 16F. 2d 473 PR (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 May; 34(12):2. PubMed ID: 7517052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nurses failed to 'advocate' for their patient. Case on point: Rowe v. Sisters of Pallottine Missionary Society, 2001 WL 1585453 s.e.2d -WV.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Jan; 42(8):2. PubMed ID: 15301071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Live birth question: wrongful death action. Case in point: Wheeler v. Yettie Kersting Mem. Hosp. (761 S.W. 2d 785--TX (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Mar; 29(10):4. PubMed ID: 2704835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is R.N. practice of medicine negligence per se? Case in point: Turek v. Elizabeth Com. Health Ctr (488 N.W. 2d 567--NE [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Nov; 33(6):2. PubMed ID: 1302862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Posey restrained pt. chokes--brain damage: immunity issue. Case in point: Allen v. Montgomery Hosp. 668 A. 2d 565--PA (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Feb; 36(9):4. PubMed ID: 8711129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Failure to file suit timely: doctrine of Contra Non Valentem. Case in point: Wimberly v. Schumpert Med. Center 641 So. 2d 1016--LA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Dec; 35(7):4. PubMed ID: 7838973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Can doctors rely on nurses' sponge counts? Case in point: Van Hook v. Anderson (824 P. 2d 509--WA (1992)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Apr; 32(11):2. PubMed ID: 1603936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vicarious liability for nurses: "borrowed servant" doctrine. Case in point: Parker v. Hosp. Auth. of City of Bainbridge 446 S.E.2d 766--GA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Oct; 35(5):2. PubMed ID: 7816924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The evolution of a claim in a medical malpractice case.
    Resh C
    Natl Med Leg J; 1991; 2(2):1, 10-1. PubMed ID: 1747429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nurses fail to listen to patient's complaints. Case in point: Harmon v. Patel 617 N.E. 2d 183--IL (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Oct; 34(5):2. PubMed ID: 8248493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.