These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8718152)

  • 1. Methodologic trends in the healthcare professions: computer adaptive and computer simulation testing.
    Forker JE; McDonald ME
    Nurse Educ; 1996; 21(4):13-4. PubMed ID: 8718152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving the Acquisition of Basic Technical Surgical Skills with VR-Based Simulation Coupled with Computer-Based Video Instruction.
    Rojas D; Kapralos B; Dubrowski A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 220():323-8. PubMed ID: 27046599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The transition of the national certification examination from paper and pencil to computer adaptive testing.
    Zaglaniczny KL
    AANA J; 1996 Feb; 64(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8928607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of linear, fixed-form computer-based testing versus traditional paper-and-pencil-format testing in veterinary medical education.
    Folk LC; March JZ; Hurst RD
    J Vet Med Educ; 2006; 33(3):455-64. PubMed ID: 17035224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computerized versus paper-and-pencil testing methods for a nursing certification examination: a review of the literature.
    Vrabel M
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2004; 22(2):94-8; quiz 99-100. PubMed ID: 15520572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Virtual patients for assessing medical students--important aspects when considering the introduction of a new assessment format.
    Waldmann UM; Gulich MS; Zeitler HP
    Med Teach; 2008 Feb; 30(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 18278646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment instruments used during anaesthetic simulation: review of published studies.
    Byrne AJ; Greaves JD
    Br J Anaesth; 2001 Mar; 86(3):445-50. PubMed ID: 11573541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving assessment with virtual patients.
    Round J; Conradi E; Poulton T
    Med Teach; 2009 Aug; 31(8):759-63. PubMed ID: 19811215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A contrasting-groups approach to standard setting for performance assessments of clinical skills.
    Clauser BE; Clyman SG
    Acad Med; 1994 Oct; 69(10 Suppl):S42-4. PubMed ID: 7916824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An integrative review of computer-based simulation in the education process.
    Ravert P
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2002; 20(5):203-8. PubMed ID: 12352106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Student evaluation of a standardized comprehensive testing program.
    Richards EA; Stone CL
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2008; 29(6):363-5. PubMed ID: 19244803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Impact of Item Parameter Drift in Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT).
    Risk N
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(1):54-78. PubMed ID: 26784378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computerized adaptive testing for the national certification examination.
    Bergstrom BA
    AANA J; 1996 Apr; 64(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 9095684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computerized Clinical Simulation Testing: its use for competence assessment in nursing.
    Bersky AK; Yocom CJ
    Nurs Health Care; 1994 Mar; 15(3):120-7. PubMed ID: 8152636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computerized Clinical Simulation Testing. A new look for the NCLEX-RN examination?
    Bersky AK; Krawczak J; Kumar TD
    Nurse Educ; 1998; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 9505690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of a computer simulation to evaluate the clinical performance of nursing students.
    Sweeney MA; O'Malley M; Freeman E
    J Nurs Educ; 1982 Nov; 21(9):28-38. PubMed ID: 6294021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment methodology for computer-based instructional simulations.
    Koenig A; Iseli M; Wainess R; Lee JJ
    Mil Med; 2013 Oct; 178(10 Suppl):47-54. PubMed ID: 24084305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations.
    Halkitis PN
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(2):97-122. PubMed ID: 9661734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A customized simulation system with computer integrated auto-evaluation function for upper endoscopy training.
    Surangsrirat D; Deshpande AR; Surangsrirat S; Tapia MA; Zhao W
    Technol Health Care; 2011; 19(2):79-90. PubMed ID: 21422532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Examination of Metrics for a Simulated Ventriculostomy Part-Task.
    Armstrong R; Noltie D; Eagleson R; De Ribaupierre S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 220():29-32. PubMed ID: 27046549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.