These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8718488)

  • 1. Comparison of performance with a conventional and a two-channel hearing aid.
    Schuchman G; Franqui M; Beck LB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1996 Jan; 7(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 8718488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments.
    Kiessling J; Steffens T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():67-74. PubMed ID: 8153566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of calculated, measured and self-assessed intelligibility of speech in noise for hearing-aid users.
    Magnusson L; Karlsson M; Ringdahl A; Israelsson B
    Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(3):160-71. PubMed ID: 11683454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhanced speech perception at low signal-to-noise ratios with multichannel compression hearing aids.
    Yund EW; Buckles KM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1224-40. PubMed ID: 7876444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP).
    Cox RM; Gilmore C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):343-57. PubMed ID: 2359275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contribution of a frequency-compression hearing aid to contralateral cochlear implant performance.
    Perreau AE; Bentler RA; Tyler RS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):105-20. PubMed ID: 23357804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognition of speech in noise with hearing aids using dual microphones.
    Valente M; Fabry DA; Potts LG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1995 Nov; 6(6):440-9. PubMed ID: 8580504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A digital filterbank hearing aid: predicting user preference and performance for two signal processing algorithms.
    Lunner T; Hellgren J; Arlinger S; Elberling C
    Ear Hear; 1997 Feb; 18(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 9058034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transitioning hearing aid users with severe and profound loss to a new gain/frequency response: benefit, perception, and acceptance.
    Convery E; Keidser G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Mar; 22(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 21545769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech discrimination with an 8-channel compression hearing aid and conventional aids in background of speech-band noise.
    Yund EW; Simon HJ; Efron R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):161-80. PubMed ID: 3430375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Johnson JS; Clark TM; Pluvinage V
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multichannel compression hearing aids: effect of number of channels on speech discrimination in noise.
    Yund EW; Buckles KM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1206-23. PubMed ID: 7876443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the benefit provided by well-fit linear hearing aids and instruments with automatic reductions of low-frequency gain.
    Humes LE; Christensen LA; Bess FH; Hedley-Williams A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 40(3):666-85. PubMed ID: 9210122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of high-frequency amplification on the objective and subjective performance of hearing instrument users with varying degrees of high-frequency hearing loss.
    Plyler PN; Fleck EL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Jun; 49(3):616-27. PubMed ID: 16787899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing the performance of the Widex SENSO digital hearing aid with analog hearing aids.
    Valente M; Fabry DA; Potts LG; Sandlin RE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1998 Oct; 9(5):342-60. PubMed ID: 9806408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance with an adaptive frequency response hearing aid in a sample of elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Gordon-Salant S; Sherlock LP
    Ear Hear; 1992 Aug; 13(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 1397768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A "Goldilocks" Approach to Hearing Aid Self-Fitting: Ear-Canal Output and Speech Intelligibility Index.
    Mackersie C; Boothroyd A; Lithgow A
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):107-115. PubMed ID: 29894379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binaurality in middle ear implant recipients using contralateral digital hearing AIDS.
    Saliba I; Calmels MN; Wanna G; Iversenc G; James C; Deguine O; Fraysse B
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Jul; 26(4):680-5. PubMed ID: 16015168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.