BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8718763)

  • 1. The importance of being upright: use of environmental and viewer-centered reference frames in shape discriminations of novel three-dimensional objects.
    Friedman A; Lawrence Hall D
    Mem Cognit; 1996 May; 24(3):285-95. PubMed ID: 8718763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of distance between objects and distance from the vertical axis on shape identity judgments.
    Friedman A; Pilon DJ
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Sep; 22(5):552-64. PubMed ID: 7968551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reference frame and effects of orientation on finding the tops of rotated objects.
    McMullen PA; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Aug; 18(3):807-20. PubMed ID: 1500877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orientation of human optokinetic nystagmus to gravity: a model-based approach.
    Gizzi M; Raphan T; Rudolph S; Cohen B
    Exp Brain Res; 1994; 99(2):347-60. PubMed ID: 7925815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do top and bottom contribute to object perception more than left and right?
    Navon D
    Psychol Res; 2009 Sep; 73(5):613-22. PubMed ID: 18998162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mental rotation of letters, body parts and scenes during whole-body tilt: role of a body-centered versus a gravitational reference frame.
    Bock OL; Dalecki M
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Apr; 40():352-8. PubMed ID: 25682375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stereoscopic shape discrimination is well preserved across changes in object size.
    Norman JF; Swindle JM; Jennings LR; Mullins EM; Beers AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 19389660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of physical stability and center of mass of 3-D objects.
    Cholewiak SA; Fleming RW; Singh M
    J Vis; 2015 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 25761331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Top-bottom and front-behind decisions on rotated objects.
    Jolicoeur P; Ingleton M; Bartram L; Booth KS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Dec; 47(4):657-77. PubMed ID: 8124290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Must egocentric and environmental frames of reference be aligned to produce spatial S-R compatibility effects?
    Ladavas E; Moscovitch M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Apr; 10(2):205-15. PubMed ID: 6232340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Organizational principles of velocity storage in three dimensions. The effect of gravity on cross-coupling of optokinetic after-nystagmus.
    Raphan T; Cohen B
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1988; 545():74-92. PubMed ID: 3239884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mental rotation may underlie apparent object-based neglect.
    Buxbaum LJ; Coslett HB; Montgomery MW; Farah MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 1996 Feb; 34(2):113-26. PubMed ID: 8852874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vertical disparity affects shape and size judgments across surfaces separated in depth.
    O'Kane LM; Hibbard PB
    Perception; 2007; 36(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 17624116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reference Frames and 3-D Shape Perception of Pictured Objects: On Verticality and Viewpoint-From-Above.
    Cornelis EV; van Doorn AJ; Wagemans J
    Iperception; 2016 May; 7(3):2041669516637286. PubMed ID: 27433329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selectivity for three-dimensional contours and surfaces in the anterior intraparietal area.
    Theys T; Srivastava S; van Loon J; Goffin J; Janssen P
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Feb; 107(3):995-1008. PubMed ID: 22090458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flipping and spinning: spatial transformation procedures in the identification of rotated natural objects.
    Murray JE
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Jan; 25(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 9046872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shape analysis and stereopsis for human depth perception.
    Kumar T; Glaser DA
    Vision Res; 1992 Mar; 32(3):499-512. PubMed ID: 1604837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recognizing a plane-misoriented view of a familiar object is not influenced by the ease of specifying the main axis of elongation of that object.
    Lawson R
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Feb; 66(2):234-48. PubMed ID: 15129745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stereo disparity facilitates view generalization during shape recognition for solid multipart objects.
    Cristino F; Davitt L; Hayward WG; Leek EC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(12):2419-36. PubMed ID: 25679983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Viewer-external frames of reference in the mental transformation of 3-D objects.
    Waszak F; Drewing K; Mausfeld R
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Oct; 67(7):1269-79. PubMed ID: 16502847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.