These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8718763)
41. Meridional anisotropy in the discrimination of parallel and perpendicular lines--effect of body tilt. Chen S; Levi DM Perception; 1996; 25(6):633-49. PubMed ID: 8888297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Effects of object asymmetry on visual attention. Maguire AM; Bates TC; Boycott N; Corballis MC Brain Cogn; 2002; 48(2-3):457-62. PubMed ID: 12030488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Asymmetric response time functions during left-/right-facing discriminations of rotated objects: The short and the long of it. Searle JA; Hamm JP Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):124-42. PubMed ID: 26228032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Control of spatial orientation of the angular vestibuloocular reflex by the nodulus and uvula. Wearne S; Raphan T; Cohen B J Neurophysiol; 1998 May; 79(5):2690-715. PubMed ID: 9582239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Tilted frames of reference have similar effects on the perception of gravitational vertical and the planning of vertical saccadic eye movements. Morgan M; Grant S; Melmoth D; Solomon JA Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 233(7):2115-25. PubMed ID: 25921228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Detection of symmetry as a function of angular orientation. Corballis MC; Roldan CE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Aug; 1(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 1202144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Psychophysical and physiological evidence for viewer-centered object representations in the primate. Logothetis NK; Pauls J Cereb Cortex; 1995; 5(3):270-88. PubMed ID: 7613082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Turning objects on their heads: the influence of the stored axis on object individuation. Harris IM; Dux PE Percept Psychophys; 2005 Aug; 67(6):1010-5. PubMed ID: 16396009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. How we perceive the trajectory of an approaching object. Duke PA; Rushton SK J Vis; 2012 Mar; 12(3):9. PubMed ID: 22408040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Frame-of-reference and hierarchical-organisation effects in the rod-and-frame illusion. Zoccolotti P; Antonucci G; Daini R; Martelli ML; Spinelli D Perception; 1997; 26(12):1485-94. PubMed ID: 9616476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The role of a local reference in stereoscopic detection of depth relief. Petrov Y; Glennerster A Vision Res; 2004 Feb; 44(4):367-76. PubMed ID: 14659963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Disparity-defined objects moving in depth do not elicit three-dimensional shape constancy. Scarfe P; Hibbard PB Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1599-610. PubMed ID: 16364392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Binocular perception of slant about oblique axes relative to a visual frame of reference. van Ee R; Erkelens CJ Perception; 1995; 24(3):299-314. PubMed ID: 7617431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Large perceptual distortions of locomotor action space occur in ground-based coordinates: Angular expansion and the large-scale horizontal-vertical illusion. Klein BJ; Li Z; Durgin FH J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):581-93. PubMed ID: 26594884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Frames of reference for allocating attention to space: evidence from the neglect syndrome. Farah MJ; Brunn JL; Wong AB; Wallace MA; Carpenter PA Neuropsychologia; 1990; 28(4):335-47. PubMed ID: 2342640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]