214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8719080)
1. An in vitro biomechanical study of a multiplanar circular external fixator applied to equine third metacarpal bones.
Cervantes C; Madison JB; Miller GJ; Casar RS
Vet Surg; 1996; 25(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8719080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of two interlocking-nail systems for fixation of ostectomized equine third metacarpal bones.
Lopez MJ; Wilson DG; Trostle SS; Markel MD
Vet Surg; 2001; 30(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 11340556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical study in vitro on the use of self-designed external fixator in diaphyseal III metacarpal fractures in horses.
Turek B; Potyński A; Wajler C; Szara T; Czopowicz M; Drewnowska O
Pol J Vet Sci; 2015; 18(2):323-32. PubMed ID: 26172182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of an interlocking nail system and dynamic compression plate fixation of ostectomized equine third metacarpal bones.
Lopez MJ; Wilson DG; Vanderby R; Markel MD
Vet Surg; 1999; 28(5):333-40. PubMed ID: 10493637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanics of Supplemental Drop Wire and Half-Pin Fixation Elements in Single Ring Circular External Fixator Constructs.
Lewis RA; Lewis DD; Anderson CL; Hudson CC; Coggeshall JD; Iorgulescu AD; Banks SA
Vet Surg; 2016 May; 45(4):471-9. PubMed ID: 27009685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical evaluation of external skeletal fixator-intramedullary pin tie-in configurations applied to cadaveral humeri from red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis).
Van Wettere AJ; Redig PT; Wallace LJ; Bourgeault CA; Bechtold JE
J Avian Med Surg; 2009 Dec; 23(4):277-85. PubMed ID: 20235458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical performance of hybrid Ilizarov external fixator in comparison with Ilizarov circular external fixator.
Yilmaz E; Belhan O; Karakurt L; Arslan N; Serin E
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Jul; 18(6):518-22. PubMed ID: 12828901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro biomechanical testing of different configurations of acrylic external skeletal fixator constructs.
Tyagi SK; Aithal HP; Kinjavdekar P; Amarpal ; Pawde AM; Srivastava T; Singh J; Madhu DN
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2015; 28(4):227-33. PubMed ID: 25998130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of hydroxyapatite coated and uncoated ao cortical bone screws for a limited contact: dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine 3rd metacarpal bones.
Durham ME; Sod GA; Riggs LM; Mitchell CF
Vet Surg; 2015 Feb; 44(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 25132492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Axial characteristics of circular external skeletal fixator single ring constructs.
Lewis DD; Bronson DG; Cross AR; Welch RD; Kubilis PS
Vet Surg; 2001; 30(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 11443601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of in vitro mechanical properties of different designs of epoxy-pin external skeletal fixation systems.
Tyagi SK; Aithal HP; Kinjavdekar P; Amarpal ; Pawde AM; Srivastava T; Tyagi KP; Monsang SW
Vet Surg; 2014 Mar; 43(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 24410773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of a prototype equine metacarpal dynamic compression plate fixation with double dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones.
Sod GA; Hubert JD; Martin GS; Gill MS
Vet Surg; 2005; 34(6):594-603. PubMed ID: 16343147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro comparison of metaphyseal and diaphyseal placement of centrally threaded, positive-profile transfixation pins in the equine third metacarpal bone.
McClure SR; Hillberry BM; Fisher KE
Am J Vet Res; 2000 Oct; 61(10):1304-8. PubMed ID: 11039566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What Are the Biomechanical Properties of the Taylor Spatial Frame™?
Henderson DJ; Rushbrook JL; Harwood PJ; Stewart TD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 May; 475(5):1472-1482. PubMed ID: 27896679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A mechanical comparison of veterinary linear external fixation systems.
White DT; Bronson DG; Welch RD
Vet Surg; 2003; 32(6):507-14. PubMed ID: 14648528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro biomechanical testing of a micro external skeletal fixator.
Deiss R; Bali MS; Doherr M; Spreng D; Rytz U; Ferguson SJ
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2013; 26(5):385-91. PubMed ID: 23708943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical evaluation of various external skeletal fixator-intramedullary pin tie-in configurations using a tubular plastic bone model.
Van Wettere AJ; Wallace LJ; Redig PT; Bourgeault CA; Bechtold JE
J Avian Med Surg; 2009 Dec; 23(4):263-76. PubMed ID: 20235457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element analysis of a novel pin-sleeve system for external fixation of distal limb fractures in horses.
Brianza S; Brighenti V; Lansdowne JL; Schwieger K; Bouré L
Vet J; 2011 Nov; 190(2):260-267. PubMed ID: 21195644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of a supplemental plate on the stiffness of a type I external fixator.
Norris JL; Kraus KH; O'Leary JP
Vet Surg; 2002; 31(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 11884958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of a limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation with a dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones.
Sod GA; Hubert JD; Martin GS; Gill MS
Vet Surg; 2005; 34(6):579-86. PubMed ID: 16343145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
