BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8719362)

  • 1. Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence. 5-year results in 153 women.
    Kinn AC
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1995 Dec; 29(4):449-55. PubMed ID: 8719362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling.
    Lemack GE; Krauss S; Litman H; FitzGerald MP; Chai T; Nager C; Sirls L; Zyczynski H; Baker J; Lloyd K; Steers WD;
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2076-80. PubMed ID: 18804239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The clinical and urodynamic effects of anterior vaginal repair and Burch colposuspension.
    van Geelen JM; Theeuwes AG; Eskes TK; Martin CB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jul; 159(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 3394733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Urodynamic results of Burch colposuspension].
    Schürmann R; Ralph G
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(9):577-81. PubMed ID: 2378188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Long-term outcome of incontinence and prolapse surgery at the Heidelberg University Gynecologic Clinic 1980-1992].
    Maleika-Rabe A; Wallwiener D; Grischke EM; Solomayer E; Bastert G
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1998; 120(3):106-12. PubMed ID: 9556900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic morphological changes in the anterior vaginal wall before and after laparoscopic Burch colposuspension in primary urodynamic stress incontinence.
    Yang JM; Yang SH; Huang WC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 25(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 15736202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [5 years results of incontinence operations].
    Tamussino K; Zivkovic F; Pieber D; Ralph G
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1995; 35(3):175-6. PubMed ID: 7496187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term results after Burch colposuspension.
    Feyereisl J; Dreher E; Haenggi W; Zikmund J; Schneider H
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Sep; 171(3):647-52. PubMed ID: 8092210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term efficacy of Burch colposuspension: a 14-year follow-up study.
    Kjølhede P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Aug; 84(8):767-72. PubMed ID: 16026403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Modified sacrocolpopexy combined with a Burch procedure for recurrent stress urinary incontinence].
    Seif C; Hamann M; Braun PM; Jünemann KP
    Aktuelle Urol; 2006 May; 37(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 16733823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Stress incontinence in women. Is there still an indication to perform the Burch colposuspension and the fascial sling procedure?].
    Goepel M; Bross S
    Urologe A; 2009 May; 48(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 19421799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension to reduce urinary stress incontinence.
    Brubaker L; Cundiff GW; Fine P; Nygaard I; Richter HE; Visco AG; Zyczynski H; Brown MB; Weber AM;
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Apr; 354(15):1557-66. PubMed ID: 16611949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multichannel urodynamic evaluation of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for genuine stress incontinence.
    Ross JW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jan; 91(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 9464721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Treatment of stress incontinence with Burch colposuspension].
    Rammer E; Friedrich F; Burger F
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1992; 32 Suppl 1():136-7. PubMed ID: 1286322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The value of simultaneous hysterectomy during Burch colposuspension for urinary stress incontinence.
    Langer R; Ron-El R; Neuman M; Herman A; Bukovsky I; Caspi E
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Dec; 72(6):866-9. PubMed ID: 3186095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stress urinary incontinence and posterior bladder suspension defects. Results of vaginal repair versus Burch colposuspension.
    Thunedborg P; Fischer-Rasmussen W; Jensen SB
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1990; 69(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 2346081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Changes in values of urethral closure pressure and its position after Burch colposuspension--predictive value of MUCP and VLPP for successful rate of this operation].
    Martan A; Masata J; Svabík K; Drahorádová P; Pavlíková M
    Ceska Gynekol; 2006 May; 71(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 16768049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Surgical strategy in incontinence and prolapse].
    Schär G; Köchli OR; Fink D; Haller U
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1993; 33(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 8400913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of genital prolapse after Burch colposuspension.
    Kjølhede P; Norén B; Rydén G
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1996 Oct; 75(9):849-54. PubMed ID: 8931511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sacral colpopexy with concurrent Burch colposuspension in patients with vaginal vault prolapse.
    Wille S; Braun M; Heidenreich A; Hofmann R; Engelmann U
    Urol Int; 2006; 76(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 16679837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.