These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8721699)

  • 1. Contrast cine left ventriculography: comparison of two pigtail catheter shapes and analysis of factors determining the final quality.
    Deligonul U; Jones S; Shurmur S; Oskarsson H
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Apr; 37(4):428-33. PubMed ID: 8721699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved left ventriculography with the new 5F helical-tip Halo catheter.
    Caracciolo EA; Kern MJ; Collis WC; Bach RG; Donohue TJ; Mechem C; Aguire FV
    Am Heart J; 1994 Oct; 128(4):724-32. PubMed ID: 7524294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of low-volume versus standard-volume left ventriculography.
    Hodges MC; Rollefson WA; Sample SA; Rubal BJ; Stajduhar KC
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2001 Mar; 52(3):314-9. PubMed ID: 11246243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The relationships between left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in mitral and aortic regurgitation (author's transl)].
    Strauer BE; Kramer H; Bolte H; Riecker G
    Klin Wochenschr; 1975 Oct; 53(20):795-84. PubMed ID: 1202276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Usefulness of newly designed pigtail catheter with multiple side holes by reducing incidence of ventricular ectopy.
    Hirose M; Shimada K; Sakanoue Y; Hirata K; Takeuchi K; Yoshikawa J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Oct; 48(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 10506786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduced incidence of ventricular ectopy with a 4F Halo catheter during pediatric cardiac catheterization.
    Geggel RL; Hijazi ZM
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1998 Jan; 43(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 9473191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impaired left ventricular contractile function in patients with long-term mitral regurgitation and normal ejection fraction.
    Starling MR; Kirsh MM; Montgomery DG; Gross MD
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Jul; 22(1):239-50. PubMed ID: 8509547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of an anterior wall motion abnormality on the results of single-plane and biplane left ventriculography.
    Tate DA; Weaver D; Dehmer GJ
    Am J Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 70(7):791-6. PubMed ID: 1519532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Usefulness of digital subtraction left ventriculography in patients with ischemic heart disease: comparison with cineangiography.
    Paquet E; Bourassa MG; Lespérance J; Laurier J; Dyrda I; Lemarbre L; Bonan R; Joyal M; Corcos T
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Dec; 35(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 6396303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical utility of contrast echocardiography for quantification of left ventricular volumes and function in patients with suboptimal echocardiograms].
    Dittmann H; Razwan E; Seipel L
    Z Kardiol; 1999 Sep; 88(9):640-6. PubMed ID: 10525925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of left ventricular function by digital subtraction angiography: effect of dose and administration mode of contrast medium, and comparison with direct ventriculography].
    Kuribayashi S; Ootaki M; Matsuyama S; Kanemoto N; Furuya H
    J Cardiogr; 1985 Sep; 15(3):575-84. PubMed ID: 3915507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comprehensive tissue Doppler assessment of left ventricular function in patients with primary mitral regurgitation.
    Borg AN; Deepak SM; Beynon RP; Williams SG; Ray SG
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2007 Oct; 20(10):1149-59. PubMed ID: 17604962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mitral regurgitation in patients with coronary artery disease and low left ventricular ejection fractions. How should it be treated?
    Christenson JT; Simonet F; Maurice J; Bloch A; Velebit V; Schmuziger M
    Tex Heart Inst J; 1995; 22(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 7580362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the angiographic accuracy of digital left ventriculography.
    Nichols AB; Martin EC; Fles TP; Stugensky KM; Balancio LA; Casarella WJ; Weiss MB
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Jan; 51(1):224-30. PubMed ID: 6849261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction by cine computed tomography and single plane right anterior oblique ventriculography.
    MacMillan RM; Rees MR; Maranhao V; Clark DL
    Angiology; 1986 Apr; 37(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 3717695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Function of the right ventricle in patients with mitral valve diseases].
    Unterberg R; König S; Völker W; Pietsch-Breitfeld B; Karsch KR
    Z Kardiol; 1989 Jun; 78(6):386-93. PubMed ID: 2756735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Catheter optimization during contrast ventriculography: a prospective randomized trial.
    Lehmann KG; Yang JC; Doria RJ; Kumamoto KS; Feuer JM; Olson HG; Hoang TD; Zeldow WC
    Am Heart J; 1992 May; 123(5):1273-8. PubMed ID: 1575145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of left ventricular performance after mitral valve repair or valve replacement with or without chordal preservation.
    Okita Y; Miki S; Ueda Y; Tahata T; Sakai T; Matsuyama K
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Mar; 2(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 8261153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of digital intravenous ventriculography with direct left ventriculography for quantitation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions.
    Norris SL; Slutsky RA; Mancini J; Ashburn WL; Gregoratos G; Peterson KL; Higgins CB
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 May; 51(8):1399-403. PubMed ID: 6846167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of left ventricular performance in aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation and mitral regurgitation from the stroke work/left ventricular mass ratio.
    Nitenberg A; Richalet JP; Laurent D
    Eur J Cardiol; 1979 Oct; 10(4):279-94. PubMed ID: 159181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.