132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8721964)
21. Patient dose reduction by audit of grid usage in barium enemas.
Seymour R
Br J Radiol; 1997 May; 70(833):489-91. PubMed ID: 9227230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reduction of radiation dose to patients undergoing barium enema by dose audit.
Yu SK; Cheung YK; Chan TL; Kung CM; Yuen MK
Br J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 74(878):162-5. PubMed ID: 11718389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Patient radiation doses from enteroclysis examinations.
Hart D; Haggett PJ; Boardman P; Nolan DJ; Wall BF
Br J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 67(802):997-1000. PubMed ID: 8000845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Shielding effect of radiation dose reduction fiber during the use of C-arm fluoroscopy: a phantom study.
Cha H; Lee K; Park MS; Lee KM; Cho K; Sung KH
J Radiat Res; 2020 Sep; 61(5):705-711. PubMed ID: 32766722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of patient doses due to fluoroscopic exposures.
Noto K; Matsubara K; Koshida K; Iida H; Yamamoto T
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):234-6. PubMed ID: 21561943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. DTS 5.1 and DFS. Barium enema by a junior specialist registrar: are the doses to patients acceptable?
Doss A
Clin Radiol; 2002 Sep; 57(9):861. PubMed ID: 12384117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Hawthorne effect: shortening of fluoroscopy times during radiation measurement studies.
Vehmas T
Br J Radiol; 1997 Oct; 70(838):1053-5. PubMed ID: 9404210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The secondary radiation grid; its effect on fluoroscopic dose-area product during barium enema examinations.
Lloyd P; Lowe D; Harty DS; Eyes B
Br J Radiol; 1998 Mar; 71(843):303-6. PubMed ID: 9616240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Patient and staff doses for some complex x-ray examinations.
Olgar T; Bor D; Berkmen G; Yazar T
J Radiol Prot; 2009 Sep; 29(3):393-407. PubMed ID: 19690354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Patient specific doses used to analyse the optimum dose delivery in barium enema examinations.
Lampinen JS; Rannikko S
Br J Radiol; 1999 Dec; 72(864):1185-95. PubMed ID: 10703476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Radiation dose and diagnosticity of barium enema examinations by radiographers and radiologists: a comparative study.
Crawley MT; Shine B; Booth A
Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):399-405. PubMed ID: 9659133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Neutron fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients for embryo and fetus.
Chen J; Meyerhof D; Vlahovich S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):693-8. PubMed ID: 15353732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Enteroclysis and small bowel series: comparison of radiation dose and examination time.
Thoeni RF; Gould RG
Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):659-62. PubMed ID: 1994398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A review of factors affecting patient doses for barium enemas and meals.
Martin CJ
Br J Radiol; 2004 Oct; 77(922):864-8. PubMed ID: 15482999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Estimation of effective dose and radiation risk in pediatric barium studies procedures.
Sulieman A; Elhag B; Alkhorayef M; Babikir E; Theodorou K; Kappas C; Bradley D
Appl Radiat Isot; 2018 Aug; 138():40-44. PubMed ID: 28757351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dose audit and evaluation of work practices during barium procedures using digital radiography techniques.
Livingstone RS; Augustine P; Aparna I; Raj DV
Health Phys; 2004 Oct; 87(4):358-65. PubMed ID: 15359182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Extended conversion coefficients for use in radiation protection of the embryo and fetus against external neutrons from 10 MeV to 100 GeV.
Chen J
Health Phys; 2006 Mar; 90(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 16505619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Patient and occupational dosimetry in double contrast barium enema examinations.
Kemerink GJ; Borstlap AC; Frantzen MJ; Schultz FW; Zoetelief J; van Engelshoven JM
Br J Radiol; 2001 May; 74(881):420-8. PubMed ID: 11388990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A Nordic survey of patient doses in diagnostic radiology.
Grøn P; Olerud HM; Einarsson G; Leitz W; Servomaa A; Schoultz BW; Hjardemaal O
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(12):1988-92. PubMed ID: 11305583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Gastrointestinal imaging: a systems analysis comparing digital and conventional techniques.
Chawla S; Levine MS; Laufer I; Gingold EL; Kelly TJ; Langlotz CP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 May; 172(5):1279-84. PubMed ID: 10227502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
